Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
[Defibrillator implantation associated with ventricular arrhythmia ablation: an emerging hybrid approach]
Carlo Lavalle1, Claudio Pandozi, Massimo Santini
1Dipartimento Cardiovascolare, Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero, San Filippo Neri, Roma. c.lavalle@sanfilipponeri.roma.it
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) manage ventricular arrhythmias but do not prevent them. Transcatheter ablation offers a complementary treatment to ICDs, reducing arrhythmia recurrence and improving outcomes for high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Context:
- Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a major cause of sudden cardiac death.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality but do not prevent VAs.
- ICD interventions can cause debilitating symptoms and psychological distress.
Purpose:
- To evaluate transcatheter ablation as a complementary therapy to ICDs for managing ventricular arrhythmias.
- To assess the efficacy of ablation in reducing arrhythmia relapse and improving outcomes in patients with ICDs.
Summary:
- Transcatheter ablation is safe and effective in reducing VA recurrence, particularly in patients experiencing multiple ICD interventions or electrical storm.
- Ablation can interrupt dramatic arrhythmic events when ICDs are insufficient.
- It is also considered for secondary prevention in ICD patients before device intervention.
Impact:
- Transcatheter ablation offers an optimal, complementary strategy to ICDs for managing patients at high risk of sudden death from VAs.
- This approach aims to improve quality of life by reducing ICD shocks and associated symptoms.
Abstract:
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and are the leading cause of sudden cardiac death. Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) proved to be effective in reducing both sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality, the ideal therapy remains to be defined because ICD implantation allows to interrupt life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias but does not prevent them. ICD interventions, in terms of shock delivery and antitachycardia pacing, are often associated with invalidating symptoms, such as chest pain, sensation of rapid heartbeat and syncope, and may cause depression in many patients. Both appropriate and inappropriate shocks have been shown to be associated with a worse prognosis. Transcatheter ablation proved to be safe and effective in reducing arrhythmia relapse in patients who experience multiple ICD interventions or electrical storm. In the latter patient subset, ablation often represents the only possibility of interrupting such dramatic events. Ablation has also been evaluated in patients implanted with an ICD in secondary prevention, before device intervention. To date, transcatheter ablation represents an optimal opportunity, complementary to ICD, in the treatment of patients at high risk for sudden death and episodes of ventricular arrhythmias.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...