Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Modeling social and evolutionary games
1Department of Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, 206 McMicken Hall, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0374, USA. angela.potochnik@uc.edu
Abstract:
When game theory was introduced to biology, the components of classic game theory models were replaced with elements more befitting evolutionary phenomena. The actions of intelligent agents are replaced by phenotypic traits; utility is replaced by fitness; rational deliberation is replaced by natural selection. In this paper, I argue that this classic conception of comprehensive reapplication is misleading, for it overemphasizes the discontinuity between human behavior and evolved traits. Explicitly considering the representational roles of evolutionary game theory brings to attention areas of overlap that are often neglected, and so a range of evolutionary possibilities that are often overlooked. The clarifications this analysis provides are well illustrated by-and particularly valuable for-game theoretic treatments of the evolution of social behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game
Evolutionary Psychology
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Modeling with Differential Equations
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
