Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stages of General Anesthesia01:22

Stages of General Anesthesia

Various sedation levels offer significant advantages in facilitating procedural interventions for patients undergoing medical or invasive surgical procedures. These levels span from anxiolysis to general anesthesia, providing a spectrum of sedative effects to cater to specific patient needs. Anxiolysis reduces anxiety and is achieved through minimal sedation, enabling patients to remain awake and responsive while feeling more at ease during the procedure. This level can benefit minor...
General Anesthesia: Overview01:24

General Anesthesia: Overview

Anesthesia is a medical procedure that uses drugs for CNS suppression to enable painless surgeries and procedures. The selection of anesthetics is influenced by their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and patient characteristics. Various types of anesthesia include general, local, regional, spinal, and inhalational.
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia01:29

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia

Epidural anesthetics are administered in the fat-filled epidural space, the outermost part of the spinal canal. This technique is commonly employed for pain management and anesthesia during lower abdomen and pelvis surgeries or labor and delivery.
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia01:11

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal anesthetics are given during lower abdomen and limb surgeries to block sensory and motor neurons. They are administered in the mid to low lumbar regions, primarily acting on the cauda equina's nerve roots. The blockade level depends on the local anesthetic (LA) concentration. Usually, low LA concentrations are sufficient to block sensory fibers, while only high LA concentrations block motor fibers. Other factors like injection volume and speed, the patient's posture, and the drug...
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview01:20

Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview

Inhalation anesthetics are drugs that induce general anesthesia upon inhalation. They work by increasing the sensitivity of GABAA receptors or inhibiting NMDA receptors, leading to a decrease in central nervous system activity. The depth of anesthesia can be rapidly adjusted by changing the concentration of the inhaled gas. Some common examples of inhalational anesthetics include volatile liquids like isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane and gases like xenon and nitrous oxide. Isoflurane, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digital Health Research Symposium: Opening Panel Commentary.

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health·2025
Same author

Culturally Congruent Latino-Adapted Telemonitoring of Underrepresented Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: The CULTURA-DM2 Trial.

Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association·2025
Same author

Effect of a behavioral nudge on adoption of an electronic health record-agnostic pulmonary embolism risk prediction tool: a pilot cluster nonrandomized controlled trial.

JAMIA open·2024
Same author

Understanding social risk factors in patients presenting to the emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure: A pilot study.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2024
Same author

Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided freeze-core biopsy system for canine and feline brain tumors.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2024
Same author

Robotic-assisted burring in total hip replacement: A new surgical technique to optimise acetabular preparation.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2024
Same journal

Imaging Actionable Incidental Findings: Communication and Follow Up to Eliminate Preventable Harm.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Using Deming's System of Profound Knowledge to Form Quality Focused Age-Friendly Teams.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Aligning Thrombophilia Testing With Evidence-Based Guidelines: The Impact of Clinical Decision Support Redesign in an Academic Medical Center.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

The Interrater Reliability of Cardiac Arrest Video Review: A Pilot Study.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Improving Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging the Gap.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Management Modality of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms is Associated with Lower Rates of Follow-Up.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia
06:50

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia

Published on: March 20, 2018

A multisite validity study of self-reported anesthesia outcomes.

Peter Walker1, Renee Pekmezaris, Martin L Lesser

  • 1North Shore-LIJ Health System, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA.

American Journal of Medical Quality : the Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality
|February 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validated anesthesia voluntary adverse event reporting, finding low error rates. Nonpunitive reporting may improve patient safety in anesthesia care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia
06:50

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia

Published on: March 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Patient Safety
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Voluntary adverse event reporting systems are crucial for improving patient safety in healthcare.
  • Assessing the accuracy of data collected through these systems is essential for their reliability.
  • Previous surveys indicated varying error rates in anesthesia adverse event reporting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of a multisite anesthesia voluntary adverse event reporting process.
  • To determine the accuracy of data collected through a nonpunitive voluntary reporting system.
  • To compare current error rates with historical data from similar reporting systems.

Main Methods:

  • A data validation methodology was employed using medical chart review.
  • Live records from 600 patients across three healthcare facilities were analyzed.
  • Error rates were calculated per item and per patient for 42 data items, categorized by quality indicators, demographic/status variables, and administrative items.

Main Results:

  • The aggregated per-item error rate was 0.3%, with specific rates for quality indicators (0.1%), demographic/status variables (1.3%), and administrative items (1.7%).
  • The per-patient error rate was 6.3%, with rates for quality indicators (3.0%), demographic/status variables (1.7%), and administrative items (3.0%).
  • Observed error rates were lower than those reported in previous surveys, with higher accuracy for more serious events.

Conclusions:

  • The multisite anesthesia voluntary adverse event reporting process demonstrates acceptable validity.
  • Nonpunitive voluntary reporting appears to be an effective strategy for reducing errors in anesthesia care.
  • Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize reporting systems for enhanced patient safety.