Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Radiotracer Administration for High Temporal Resolution Positron Emission Tomography of the Human Brain: Application to FDG-fPET
Published on: October 22, 2019
Methods for motion correction evaluation using 18F-FDG human brain scans on a high-resolution PET scanner
Sune H Keller1, Merence Sibomana, Oline V Olesen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. sune@pet.rh.dk
Unlabelled:
Many authors have reported the importance of motion correction (MC) for PET. Patient motion during scanning disturbs kinetic analysis and degrades resolution. In addition, using misaligned transmission for attenuation and scatter correction may produce regional quantification bias in the reconstructed emission images. The purpose of this work was the development of quality control (QC) methods for MC procedures based on external motion tracking (EMT) for human scanning using an optical motion tracking system.
Methods:
Two scans with minor motion and 5 with major motion (as reported by the optical motion tracking system) were selected from (18)F-FDG scans acquired on a PET scanner. The motion was measured as the maximum displacement of the markers attached to the subject's head and was considered to be major if larger than 4 mm and minor if less than 2 mm. After allowing a 40- to 60-min uptake time after tracer injection, we acquired a 6-min transmission scan, followed by a 40-min emission list-mode scan. Each emission list-mode dataset was divided into 8 frames of 5 min. The reconstructed time-framed images were aligned to a selected reference frame using either EMT or the AIR (automated image registration) software. The following 3 QC methods were used to evaluate the EMT and AIR MC: a method using the ratio between 2 regions of interest with gray matter voxels (GM) and white matter voxels (WM), called GM/WM; mutual information; and cross correlation.
Results:
The results of the 3 QC methods were in agreement with one another and with a visual subjective inspection of the image data. Before MC, the QC method measures varied significantly in scans with major motion and displayed limited variations on scans with minor motion. The variation was significantly reduced and measures improved after MC with AIR, whereas EMT MC performed less well.
Conclusion:
The 3 presented QC methods produced similar results and are useful for evaluating tracer-independent external-tracking motion-correction methods for human brain scans.
Insights
Quality control methods for motion correction in PET scans were developed. These methods effectively evaluate external motion tracking, though automated image registration showed better performance for major motion.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Nuclear Medicine
- Image Processing
Background:
- Patient motion during PET scans significantly impacts kinetic analysis and image resolution.
- Misaligned transmission data for attenuation and scatter correction can introduce quantification bias in emission images.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and evaluate quality control (QC) methods for motion correction (MC) in human PET scans.
- Assess MC procedures utilizing external motion tracking (EMT) via an optical system.
Main Methods:
- Selected (18)F-FDG PET scans with minor (<2 mm) and major (>4 mm) motion, identified by optical motion tracking.
- Applied automated image registration (AIR) and EMT for motion correction on time-framed emission data.
- Evaluated MC performance using three QC methods: gray/white matter ratio (GM/WM), mutual information, and cross-correlation.
Main Results:
- The three QC methods yielded consistent results, aligning with visual inspection.
- Pre-MC scans with major motion showed significant variations in QC measures; minor motion scans had limited variations.
- Post-MC, AIR significantly reduced variations and improved measures, while EMT MC performed less effectively.
Conclusions:
- The developed QC methods are reliable for evaluating tracer-independent, external-tracking motion correction techniques in human brain PET.
- Automated image registration demonstrated superior performance in motion correction for significant patient movement compared to EMT.
More Related Videos
06:53Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
Published on: July 23, 2020
08:36Multi-Tracer Studies of Brain Oxygen and Glucose Metabolism Using a Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scanner
Published on: June 7, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).