Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Cochlear implantation in children with complex needs - outcomes.

Amy Rafferty¹, Jane Martin, David Strachan

¹Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK. amyrafferty@doctors.org.uk

Cochlear Implants International

|February 16, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The United Kingdom Branch Endoprosthesis for Aortic arch Treatment study (UK-BEAT): Early experience with the GORE TAG thoracic branch endoprosthesis.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026

Same author

Non-governmental organisations and the regulation of harmful commodity industries: navigating global governance to change corporate practices.

Globalization and health·2026

Same author

Logics of (dis)engagement: mapping variation in non-government norms and approaches to alcohol, ultra-processed food and related industries - a case study from Australia.

Globalization and health·2026

Same author

Prevalent, prominent and powerful: alcohol and unhealthy food and drink advertising at a major Melbourne public transport hub.

Public health research & practice·2025

Same author

Impact of health-oriented marketing claims on young adults' alcohol product perceptions, hypothetical consumption, and beliefs: a randomized experiment.

Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)·2025

Same author

Experiences of nurse preceptors in a continuity-aligned dedicated education unit.

Contemporary nurse·2025

Cochlear implants (CIs) benefit children with complex needs, showing improvements in auditory skills. However, outcomes were less significant than in children without complex needs, suggesting a need for tailored assessments.

Area of Science:

Audiology
Pediatric Otolaryngology
Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

Cochlear implants (CIs) offer significant auditory and speech benefits.
Outcomes for children with complex needs receiving CIs are less reported.
Assessing CI efficacy in this population requires specific considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the assessment and outcomes of children with complex needs who received cochlear implants (CIs).
To compare CI outcomes in children with complex needs against a control group without complex needs.

Main Methods:

A prospective review of 19 children with complex needs undergoing CI surgery.
Pre- and 12-month post-implant assessments using audiology, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Meaningful Auditory Information Scale (MAIS), Listening Progress (LiP), and Meaningful Use of Speech (MUSS) scales.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Comparison with 230 children without complex needs at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS).

Main Results:

Children with complex needs showed improvements in CAP, MAIS, LiP, and MUSS scores post-CI.
Improvements were less pronounced compared to the control group without complex needs.
For example, LiP scores improved from 11% to 65% in the complex needs group versus 22% to 81% in the control group.

Conclusions:

Cochlear implants provide benefits for children with complex needs, though outcomes are less than in typically developing peers.
Standard outcome measures may not fully capture the benefits for this group.
Quality-of-life measures should be considered alongside communication development to reflect the true impact of CIs.