Robust labeling and comparative preclinical characterization of DOTA-TOC and DOTA-TATE

Irina Velikyan1, Hui Xu, Manoj Nair

  • 1Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, PET Center, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden. irina.velikyan@bms.uu.se

Abstract

Insights

This study compared the binding of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE somatostatin analogues. Despite differences in cell binding, their in vitro and in vivo performance in complex biological systems showed no significant differences.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry
  • Molecular Imaging
  • Theranostics

Background:

  • Somatostatin analogues labeled with radionuclides like Gallium-68 ([68Ga]) are crucial for diagnosing and treating neuroendocrine tumors.
  • Theranostic approaches require understanding ligand behavior for personalized theranostics, necessitating comparison of diagnostic ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC) and therapeutic ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) agents.
  • Investigating ligand exchange relevance is vital for tailoring imaging to radiotherapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the binding capacity of [67/68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [67/68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.
  • To evaluate the influence of production methods on the biological performance of these tracers.
  • To assess tracer performance in complex biological environments (monkey brain, rat) with heterogeneous somatostatin receptor (SSTR) distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesis and purification of [67Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC, [67Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.
  • In vitro binding assessment using autoradiography on Rhesus monkey brain cryosections.
  • In vivo/ex vivo organ distribution studies in rats.

Main Results:

  • Improved tracer production methods ensuring robustness, simplification, and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) relevance.
  • No statistically significant difference in binding or uptake of [67/68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [67/68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE in vitro (monkey brain cortex) or in vivo (rat SSTR-positive tissues).
  • Observed in vitro difference in binding affinity to SSTR2 between DOTA-TATE and DOTA-TOC was diminished in vivo.

Conclusions:

  • A robust 68Ga-labeling method was successfully introduced.
  • The biological performance of [67/68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [67/68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE showed no significant differences in complex biological systems.
  • The in vitro/in vivo results suggest that the heterogeneous receptor environment diminishes the binding differences observed in transfected cell lines.

Related Concept Videos