Childhood vision screening in Canada: public health evidence and practice

Silvina C Mema1, Lynn McIntyre, Richard Musto

  • 1Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. scmema@ucalgary.ca

Insights

Public health should screen for amblyopia (lazy eye) in preschoolers to prevent vision loss. Canada has inconsistent screening programs, creating disparities in care and increasing the risk of preventable blindness.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Best practice guidelines advocate for preschool vision testing to prevent amblyopia.
  • Universal vision screening in children aged 3-5 remains a controversial public health issue.
  • Amblyopia screening responsibilities in Canada are shared among physicians, optometrists, and Public Health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence for preschool vision screening for amblyopia using an Evidence-based Public Health (EBPH) approach.
  • To assess the implications for Public Health provision of universal screening programs in Canada.
  • To consider current screening practices across Canadian jurisdictions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search addressing key screening criteria (disease, test, treatment, program requirements).
  • Reappraisal of studies from existing systematic reviews on vision screening impact.
  • Survey of Chief Medical Officers of Health regarding existing Public Health preschool vision screening programs.

Main Results:

  • Evidence supports Public Health-led amblyopia screening based on EBPH criteria and intervention studies.
  • A significant disparity exists in Canadian amblyopia screening practices.
  • Some provinces have organized programs, while others delegate screening without monitoring uptake disparities.

Conclusions:

  • Public Health attention is crucial for amblyopia prevention.
  • Existing screening programs should be maintained.
  • Provinces lacking organized programs should reassess their role in preventing inequities and avoidable blindness.
Abstract