Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Effect of a pacing mode preserving spontaneous AV conduction on ventricular pacing burden and atrial arrhythmias
Jean-Luc Rey1, Serge Quenum, Marc Hero
1Department of cardiology, CHU Hôpital Sud, Amiens, France. rey.jean-luc@chu-amiens.fr
Background:
Using dual-chamber pacemakers with new algorithms: Manage Ventricular Pacing (MVP™), minimizes unnecessary ventricular pacing (VP). This function operates in AAI/R mode with backup VP during AV block.
Aim:
The aim of "Generation MVP" study was to assess the VP burden and atrial arrhythmias (AA) burden according to indication of pacing and MVP™ function programming of AdaptaDR implantable pacemaker (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Methods:
The multicenter observational "Generation MVP" study included 220 patients aged 75.9 ± 11 years (men = 52%) implanted for sinus node dysfunction (SND; n = 115) or atrio-ventricular block (AVB; n = 105). Programming MVP function has been left to the physician's discretion. Percentage of VP and AA burden (percentage of time spent in AA) stored in memories were assessed at 2 and 10 months.
Results:
220 patients were followed at 2 months (174 MVP [On], 46 MVP [off]) and at 10 months (165 MVP [On], 55 MVP [off]). Median percentage of VP is significantly lower when MVP is programmed [On] versus [off] at 2 and 10 months follow-up for SND and AVB indications of pacing (P < 0.001). Finally, programming MVP function is performed at middle term (10 months) for 84% of patients with SND and 65% of patients with AVB: median percentage of VP is as low as 0.6% for patients with SND and 12% for patients with AVB versus 95% for SND and 99% for AVB when MVP function is programmed [off](P < 0.001). Median AA burden was significantly lower when MVP function was programmed [On] versus [off] at 2 months (8.7% vs 28%; P < 0.001) and 10 months (1% vs 22%; P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
In this study programming MVP function decreases percentage of VP at 2 and 10 months for patients paced for SND or AVB. Moreover median AA burden is reduced when MVP function was programmed [On] vs [off] at two follow-ups.
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

