Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

A New Straightforward Method for Lipophilicity (logP) Measurement using 19F NMR Spectroscopy
Published on: January 30, 2019
How well do lipophilicity parameters, MEEKC microemulsion capacity factor, and plasma protein binding predict CNS
Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski1, Karen E Sprague, Alfonso Espada
1Drug Disposition, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA. m_zamek-gliszczynski@lilly.com
Microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography capacity factor (MEEKC k') and plasma unbound fraction (Fu) can predict the general level of central nervous system (CNS) drug binding. However, they do not offer quantitative predictions for brain Fu necessary for complex pharmacokinetic analyses.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Drug Discovery
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Brain unbound fraction (Fu) is crucial for understanding central nervous system (CNS) drug pharmacokinetics and dynamics.
- Accurate prediction of brain Fu is essential for drug development and interpretation of in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolations.
- Various surrogate predictors, including lipophilicity parameters and chromatographic factors, have been explored to estimate brain Fu.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive performance of microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography capacity factor (MEEKC k"), plasma Fu, and lipophilicity parameters (clogP, clogD(7.4)) for brain Fu.
- To evaluate the quantitative accuracy of MEEKC k' and plasma Fu in predicting brain Fu.
- To determine the utility of these predictors for pharmacokinetic/dynamic (PK/PD) data interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Correlational analysis of brain Fu with MEEKC k', plasma Fu, clogP, and clogD(7.4) for 94 and 587 diverse molecules.
- Log-log correlation analysis to assess prediction strength.
- Analysis of prediction error to estimate prediction intervals for brain Fu.
Main Results:
- MEEKC k' (r² = 0.74) was a better predictor of brain Fu than clogP (r² = 0.51-0.54) and clogD(7.4) (r² = 0.41-0.44).
- Plasma Fu (r² = 0.74-0.85) showed comparable or better prediction of brain Fu than MEEKC k'.
- Prediction intervals indicated a 10-fold (MEEKC k') and 6.9-8.6-fold (plasma Fu) uncertainty, limiting quantitative accuracy.
Conclusions:
- MEEKC k' and plasma Fu can predict the order of CNS tissue binding but lack the quantitative precision for in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolations.
- Lipophilicity parameters are less effective predictors of brain Fu compared to MEEKC k' and plasma Fu.
- Further development is needed for predictors that can provide truly quantitative brain Fu estimations for PK/PD applications.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Drug pKa, Lipophilicity and GI pH
A drug's pKa and the pH of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract play crucial roles in drug...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Drug Distribution: Plasma Protein Binding
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors
The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in its ability to bind to proteins. Lipophilic drugs, which dissolve in fats, oils, and lipids, can be bound by...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In contrast,...
Hepatic Drug Clearance: Effect of Protein Binding
For low-extraction-ratio drugs that are less than 80% protein-bound, minor changes in protein binding...

