Related Experiment Videos
Acute transfusion reactions
1Auckland Regional Blood Centre.
The New Zealand Medical Journal
|October 24, 1990
Summary
Acute transfusion reactions are mostly mild, with fever and rash being common. Laboratory tests often fail to identify the cause, suggesting a need for streamlined investigations into transfusion reactions.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Transfusion Medicine
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Acute transfusion reactions (ATRs) are a significant concern in blood product administration.
- Understanding the incidence and characteristics of ATRs is crucial for patient safety.
- Previous studies have highlighted varying rates and types of reactions across different blood products.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the incidence, clinical features, and laboratory findings of acute transfusion reactions.
- To identify the most common blood products associated with reactions and their specific symptoms.
- To evaluate the diagnostic yield of laboratory investigations in determining the etiology of ATRs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1500 acute transfusion reactions reported over a 7-year period.
- Analysis of transfusion data from approximately 440,000 transfusions.
- Categorization of reactions by blood product type, symptom presentation, and serological findings.
Main Results:
- Red blood cell transfusions had the highest reaction incidence (0.73%).
- Common symptoms included fever (72%), rigors (33%), and rash/urticaria (30%), mostly mild and transient.
- Only 12% of reactions showed identifiable serological abnormalities, with six cases of autoantibodies.
Conclusions:
- Most acute transfusion reactions are mild and transient, with red cells posing the highest risk.
- Current laboratory investigations have limited utility in accurately diagnosing the cause of most ATRs.
- A rationalized approach to investigating acute transfusion reactions is recommended to improve diagnostic efficiency.