Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects
G G Zhanel1, A E Simor, L Vercaigne
1Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre and Faculties of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Manitoba;
Objective:
To compare and contrast imipenem and meropenem in terms of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and adverse effects.
Data Selection:
MEDLINE search from 1975 to 1997 and follow-up of references.
Data Extraction:
Clinical trials comparing imipenem with meropenem, or either imipenem or meropenem with standard therapy in the treatment of serious infections were selected.
Data Synthesis:
Imipenem, the first carbapenem, was first marketed in 1987; meropenem was introduced to the market in 1996. In general, imipenem is more active against Gram-positive cocci while meropenem is more active against Gram-negative bacilli. The agents display similar pharmacokinetics. Clinical studies in patients with serious infections (intra-abdominal infection, respiratory infection, septicemia, febrile neutropenia) report similar bacteriological and clinical cure rates with imipenem and meropenem. Meropenem is approved for the treatment of bacterial meningitis, whereas imipenem is not. Adverse effects are similar.
Conclusions:
Current literature supports the use of imipenem at a dose of 500 mg every 6 h and meropenem at 1 g every 8 h for the treatment of severe infections. For the treatment of serious infections, imipenem (500 mg every 6 h or 2 g/day [$98/day]) is more economical than meropenem (1 g every 8 h or 3 g/day [$142/day]) based on acquisition cost.
Insights
Imipenem and meropenem show similar efficacy for severe infections, though meropenem is approved for bacterial meningitis. Imipenem is more economical for treating serious infections based on acquisition cost.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Microbiology
Background:
- Imipenem, the first carbapenem antibiotic, was marketed in 1987.
- Meropenem, a newer carbapenem, was introduced in 1996.
- Both are broad-spectrum antibiotics used for serious bacterial infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare imipenem and meropenem.
- Evaluation of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects.
- Determine optimal use in treating severe infections.
Main Methods:
- MEDLINE database search (1975-1997) and reference tracking.
- Inclusion of clinical trials comparing imipenem/meropenem against each other or standard therapy.
- Focus on serious infections like intra-abdominal infections, respiratory infections, septicemia, and febrile neutropenia.
Main Results:
- Imipenem exhibits greater activity against Gram-positive cocci; meropenem is more potent against Gram-negative bacilli.
- Pharmacokinetics are comparable between the two agents.
- Similar bacteriological and clinical cure rates were observed in serious infections.
- Meropenem is approved for bacterial meningitis; imipenem is not.
- Adverse effect profiles are similar.
Conclusions:
- Literature supports imipenem (500 mg q6h) and meropenem (1 g q8h) for severe infections.
- Imipenem (500 mg q6h) is more cost-effective than meropenem (1 g q8h) based on acquisition costs for treating serious infections.
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
