Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Evaluation of Fluid Overload by Bioelectrical Impedance Vectorial Analysis
Published on: August 17, 2022
Interference of silicone breast implants on bioimpedance measurement of body fat
Camila M Yamaguchi1, Joel Faintuch, Maira M Silva
1Hospital das Clinicas, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Background:
No study targeting the impact of silicone breast implants on body composition measured by bioimpedance analysis was identified.
Objective:
Aiming to clarify this question a prospective clinical study was designed.
Methods:
Adult candidates were submitted to conventional analysis at baseline and two months after the surgical intervention. In addition, unwrapped prostheses were positioned in the axillary cavity before operation and bioimpedance was measured, both with and without application of ultrasound gel for improved conductivity (sham implantation).
Results:
Patients (N = 20) were young and healthy (26.8 ± 3.6 years old, BMI 22.1 ± 3.7 kg/m(2)). In comparison with preoperative results, sham procedures pointed out increased body fat and body resistance (13.2 ± 5.6 vs 13.6 ± 5.4 kg, P = 0.017 and 523 ± 54 vs 569 ± 53 Ω, P = 0.003, respectively). Two-month follow-up confirmed the same pattern after surgical intervention, with minor discrepancies (13.2 ± 5.6 vs 13.8 ± 5.7 kg, P = 0.011 and 523 ± 54 vs 549 ± 62 Ω, P = 0.032, respectively). BMI remained stable and did not correlate with bioimpedance changes.
Conclusions:
Silicone was recognized as adipose tissue. Difference in total body fat (approximately 600 g) was consistent with used amount.
More Related Videos
07:44Evaluation of Changes in Hydration and Body Cell Mass with Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis after Exercise Program for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Published on: July 14, 2023
10:21Evaluation of Hydration Status by Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Exercise Stress Test
Published on: September 22, 2023