Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial Comment on: Artificial Intelligence Image-Recognition-Based Surgical Navigation for Identifying Nerve-Sparing Layers During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association·2026
Same author

Deep Learning Analysis of Indocyanine Green Fluoroscopy of Ureters in Robotic Cystectomy: Toward Reducing Ureteroenteric Strictures.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same author

Consensus-informed Development of Scoring Systems for Intermediate Laparoscopic Simulation Modules: An ESU Laparoscopic Workgroup Initiative.

European urology open science·2026
Same author

Simulation-based assessment in laparoscopic urology: Model design and validation challenges.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Scaling up self-supervised learning for improved surgical foundation models.

Medical image analysis·2025
Same author

Intrauterine adhesion formation following radiofrequency endometrial ablation with and without a novel intrauterine adhesion barrier film: insights from the CLEAN pilot study.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2025
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

Single versus multimodality training basic laparoscopic skills.

Willem M Brinkman1, Sanne Y Havermans, Sonja N Buzink

  • 1Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. wmbrinkman@gmail.com

Surgical Endoscopy
|February 22, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Single modality training (virtual reality simulator) and multimodality training (virtual reality, box trainer, augmented reality simulators) yield similar outcomes for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition. Both approaches are suitable for surgical education curricula.

More Related Videos

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Simulation
  • Laparoscopic Skills Training

Background:

  • Existing literature supports simulators for laparoscopic skills training.
  • Optimal integration of simulators into surgical curricula remains undetermined.
  • This study evaluates single vs. multimodality training for basic laparoscopic skills.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the training outcomes of single-modality versus multimodality approaches for basic laparoscopic skills.
  • To assess the effectiveness of different simulator types in surgical training.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-six novice medical students participated in six 45-minute training sessions.
  • Single-modality group (n=18) trained exclusively on a virtual reality (VR) simulator.
  • Multimodality group (n=18) trained on VR, box trainer, and augmented reality simulators.

Main Results:

  • Both groups demonstrated significant performance improvements.
  • No significant differences were observed between groups for an additional task or a salpingectomy simulation.
  • The single-modality group showed faster completion times on practiced tasks due to increased familiarity.

Conclusions:

  • Training basic laparoscopic tasks using single or multiple modalities results in comparable outcomes.
  • Both single and multimodality training methods are effective for developing foundational laparoscopic skills.
  • These findings support the inclusion of both approaches in future surgical training programs.