Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Home-Based EEG Hyperscanning for Infant-Caregiver Social Interactions
08:08

Home-Based EEG Hyperscanning for Infant-Caregiver Social Interactions

Published on: May 31, 2024

Bed- and sofa-sharing practices in a UK biethnic population

Helen L Ball1, Eduardo Moya, Lesley Fairley

  • 1Parent-Infant Sleep Laboratory & Medical Anthropology Research Group, Durham University, Durham, UK. H.L.Ball@dur.ac.uk

Pediatrics
|February 22, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Bed- and sofa-sharing are distinct infant sleep practices with different risk factors. These findings highlight the need for tailored sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) reduction guidelines across diverse populations.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Sleep Medicine
  • Public Health
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Bed-sharing and sofa-sharing are common infant sleep practices.
  • Understanding their prevalence and associations is crucial for infant safety.
  • These practices are often grouped together, potentially obscuring distinct risk factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the prevalence of bed- and sofa-sharing in a UK birth cohort.
  • To identify factors associated with these distinct sleep-sharing behaviors.
  • To inform targeted sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) prevention strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Telephone interviews with 3082 participants in the Born in Bradford birth cohort study.
  • Infants were aged 2 to 4 months at the time of survey.
  • Data collected on sleep surface sharing and SUDI-related behaviors.

Main Results:

  • 15.5% of families ever bed-shared; 7.2% regularly bed-shared.
  • 9.4% of families ever sofa-shared; 1.4% reported both.
  • Bed-sharing associated with Pakistani ethnicity, higher education, and breastfeeding duration. Sofa-sharing associated with smoking and breastfeeding duration, less common in Pakistani and single-parent families.

Conclusions:

  • Bed-sharing and sofa-sharing are distinct practices and should not be combined in SUDI studies.
  • Determinants of sleep-surface sharing differ between UK ethnic groups and from US minority communities.
  • Generalizing SUDI/SIDS risk factors and guidelines across diverse populations requires caution.
Abstract

More Related Videos

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Close Relationships and Culture01:29

Close Relationships and Culture

Culture shapes how people approach attraction, choose partners, and build long-term relationships. While some preferences in mate selection appear consistent across cultures, such as men valuing physical attractiveness and women emphasizing financial resources, cultural contexts influence how these preferences are expressed and prioritized. Marriage extends beyond romantic ideals in many societies and is deeply embedded in social, economic, and religious frameworks.The Role of Culture in Mate...
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...