An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Marcus Credé1, Peter Harms, Sarah Niehorster
1Department of Psychology, University at Albany-State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA. mcrede@albany.edu
Abstract:
Researchers often use very abbreviated (e.g., 1-item, 2-item) measures of personality traits due to their convenience and ease of use as well as the belief that such measures can adequately capture an individual's personality. Using data from 2 samples (N = 437 employees, N = 355 college students), we show that this practice, particularly the use of single-item measures, can lead researchers to substantially underestimate the role that personality traits play in influencing important behaviors and thereby overestimate the role played by new constructs. That is, the use of very short measures of personality may substantially increase both the Type 1 and Type 2 error rates. We argue that even slightly longer measures can substantially increase the validity of research findings without significant inconvenience to the researcher or research participants.
Related Concept Videos
Five-Factor Theory of Personality
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent thinkers. Low...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the fundamental,...
Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
Introduction to Personality Psychology
Early Theories of Personality
The study of personality dates...
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits
