Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

707

Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.

Sang J Lee1, German O Gallucci

  • 1Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|February 23, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Digital impressions significantly reduce treatment time and are perceived as easier to use than conventional impressions for single implant restorations. This pilot study highlights the efficiency benefits of digital impression techniques in dental education.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digital Implant Dentistry: The Past, the Present, the Future.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same author

Accuracy and Efficiency of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Using Three Different Registration Methods-A Laboratory Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

Impact of scan body geometry and library file modifications on matching between intraoral implant scans and library files.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same author

Dual-Hybrid Treatment Approach for Peri-Implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability.

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]·2026
Same author

Guided roll flap in combination with static computer-assisted implant surgery: A technique report.

Clinical advances in periodontics·2026
Same author

Accuracy and hallucination behaviors of artificial intelligence-based large language models for dental implant identification on radiographs.

Journal of dentistry·2026

Area of Science:

  • Dental Technology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Clinical Evaluation

Background:

  • Conventional impressions for single implant restorations can be time-consuming and technically demanding.
  • Digital impression systems offer a potential alternative for improved efficiency and patient comfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency, difficulty, and operator preference between digital and conventional impressions for single implant restorations.
  • To evaluate the time and retake requirements for both impression techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty dental students performed both conventional and digital impressions on a customized single implant model.
  • Efficiency was measured by preparation, working, and retake/rescan times.
  • Difficulty and preference were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.9K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

707
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.9K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.8K

Main Results:

  • Digital impressions were significantly faster, with a mean total treatment time of 12:29 m/s compared to 24:42 m/s for conventional impressions (P < 0.001).
  • The mean difficulty score was lower for digital impressions (30.63) than for conventional impressions (43.12) (P = 0.006).
  • Sixty percent of participants preferred the digital impression technique.

Conclusions:

  • Digital impressions are a more efficient technique for single implant restorations compared to conventional methods.
  • The digital technique presents lower difficulty, especially for inexperienced dental students.
  • Digital impressions offer significant time savings and improved user experience.