Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

06:46
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
A web-based prognostic tool for extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcomas and its external validation.
M Sampo1, M Tarkkanen, E Tukiainen
1Department of Pathology, HUSLAB and University of Helsinki, PO Box 400, HUCH-00029, Helsinki, Finland. mika.sampo@helsinki.fi
British Journal of Cancer
|February 23, 2012
Summary
A new prognostic tool (SAM) significantly improves 10-year survival prediction for soft tissue sarcoma compared to the previous SIN model. The SAM model incorporates grade, depth, and location, enhancing accuracy in both development and validation datasets.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Statistics
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies requiring accurate prognostic tools.
- Predicting long-term survival is crucial for patient management and treatment planning.
- Existing prognostic models may not fully capture the complexity of STS behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an improved prognostic tool for extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcomas.
- To predict 10-year sarcoma-specific survival with enhanced accuracy.
- To make the prognostic tool accessible via a web-based calculator.
Main Methods:
- Development of two Cox proportional hazards models (SIN and SAM) using data from Helsinki University Central Hospital (1987-2002).
- The SIN model included size, necrosis, and vascular invasion.
- The SAM model extended SIN by adding grade, depth, location, and continuous tumor size. External validation was performed using data from Lund University Hospital.
Main Results:
- The extended SAM model demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting 10-year sarcoma-specific survival.
- Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) for SAM was 0.81 (Helsinki) vs. 0.74 for SIN (P=0.0007).
- External validation showed AUCs of 0.77 for SAM and 0.73 for SIN (P=0.03), confirming improved predictive performance.
Conclusions:
- The addition of grade, depth, location, and continuous tumor size significantly enhances the accuracy of STS prognostic models.
- The SAM model offers a more precise prediction of 10-year sarcoma-specific survival compared to models relying solely on size, necrosis, and vascular invasion.
- A web-based calculator for the SAM model is available, facilitating clinical application.
