Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Review of the effectiveness of internal dosimetry monitoring regimes.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2020
Same author

THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013) FOR INTERNALLY DEPOSITED PLUTONIUM: AN OVERVIEW.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2020
Same author

THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013) FOR INTERNALLY DEPOSITED PLUTONIUM: AN OVERVIEW.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2020
Same author

MWDS-2016: THE SLOW DISSOLUTION RATE FOR PLUTONIUM NITRATE INTAKES AT THE MAYAK FACILITY.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2019
Same author

MWDS-2016: THE SLOW DISSOLUTION RATE FOR PLUTONIUM NITRATE INTAKES AT THE MAYAK FACILITY.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2019
Same author

THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM-2013 (MWDS-2013): PHASE II-QUALITY ASSURANCE OF ORGAN DOSE CALCULATIONS.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

A method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties on internal doses resulting from complex occupational exposures.

M Puncher1, A Birchall, R K Bull

  • 1Radiation Protection Division, HPA Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK. matthew.puncher@hpa.org.uk

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|February 23, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a faster Bayesian method for estimating radiation dose uncertainties from bioassay data in occupational exposure studies. The complex intake regime (CIR) significantly speeds up calculations while maintaining accuracy for cancer risk assessment.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Radiological protection
  • Occupational health
  • Bayesian statistics

Background:

  • Estimating uncertainties in radiation doses from bioassay data is crucial for epidemiology, particularly for cancer risk assessment in workers exposed to radionuclides.
  • Bayesian methods offer a robust framework for calculating these uncertainties, but can be computationally intensive with multiple intakes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel strategy to accelerate Bayesian dose uncertainty calculations for complex occupational radionuclide exposures.
  • To assess the accuracy and computational efficiency of a simplified intake pattern, the complex intake regime (CIR), compared to traditional methods.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of the Weighted Likelihood Monte Carlo Sampling (WeLMoS) method using the complex intake regime (CIR) approximation.
  • Comparison of WeLMoS-CIR performance against the computationally intensive Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method for calculating posterior distributions of doses and intakes.
  • Application to a cohort of plutonium workers from the United Kingdom Atomic Energy cohort.

Main Results:

  • The WeLMoS method with CIR demonstrated good agreement with the MCMC method, with posterior means and quantiles typically within 20%.
  • WeLMoS-CIR achieved significant computational speed-up, converging in 10-20 minutes compared to 12-72 hours for MCMC.
  • The CIR approximation proved accurate and practically feasible for routine use.

Conclusions:

  • The complex intake regime (CIR) coupled with WeLMoS provides a computationally efficient and accurate approach for estimating dose uncertainties in occupational bioassay.
  • This method facilitates more practical and timely cancer risk assessments for workers with complex exposure histories.
  • The trade-off between computational speed and accuracy is favorable for the WeLMoS-CIR method in this context.