Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis
Published on: July 18, 2016
Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and MR with diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis from
Michael Soussan1, Gaëtan Des Guetz, Vincent Barrau
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université Paris 13, CHU Avicenne, 125 rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France. michael.soussan@avc.aphp.fr
Objectives:
To assess the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT and MR with diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) for diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastrointestinal malignancies.
Methods:
Thirty consecutive patients referred for staging of gastrointestinal malignancy underwent FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI in this retrospective study. Extent of PC was characterised by dividing the peritoneal cavity into three sites in each patient: right and left supramesocolic areas and inframesocolic level (total 90 sites). Presence of PC was confirmed either by surgery (18/30) or by follow-up (12/30).
Results:
PC was confirmed in 19 patients (19/30). At a total of 90 sites, 27 showed proven PC. On a patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were respectively 84%, 73%, 84%, 73% and 80% for PET/CT and 84%, 82%, 89%, 75% and 83% for MR-DWI. On a site-based analysis, overall sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT (63%, 90%) and MR-DWI (74%, 97%) were not statistically different (P = 0.27). In the supramesocolic area, MR-DWI detected more sites involved than PET/CT (7/9 vs. 4/9). The sensitivities of PET and MR were lower for subcentimetre tumour implants (42%, 50%). Interobserver agreement was very good for PET/CT and good for MR-DWI.
Conclusions:
FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI showed similar high accuracy in diagnosing PC. Both techniques underestimated the real extent of PC because of decreased sensitivity for subcentimetre lesions.
Key Points:
FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI showed similar high accuracy for diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis. • In the supramesocolic area, MR-DWI could be more sensitive than PET/CT. • Both techniques showed lower sensitivity for subcentimetre lesions. • Interobserver agreement was very good for PET/CT and good for MR-DWI.
Insights
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) demonstrate comparable accuracy for diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Both methods exhibit reduced sensitivity for subcentimeter lesions, potentially underestimating the full extent of PC.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common complication of gastrointestinal malignancies.
- Accurate diagnosis and staging of PC are crucial for treatment planning and patient outcomes.
- Conventional imaging modalities may have limitations in detecting small peritoneal implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI for detecting PC in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.
- To assess the performance of these imaging techniques in different regions of the peritoneal cavity.
- To determine the sensitivity of each modality for detecting subcentimeter lesions.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study involving 30 consecutive patients with gastrointestinal malignancy undergoing both FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI.
- The peritoneal cavity was divided into three sites for analysis (supramesocolic and inframesocolic).
- Diagnosis confirmation was achieved through surgical assessment or follow-up imaging.
Main Results:
- FDG-PET/CT showed 80% accuracy (patient-based) and MR-DWI showed 83% accuracy.
- On a site-based analysis, MR-DWI demonstrated higher sensitivity (74%) and specificity (97%) compared to FDG-PET/CT (63%, 90%).
- Both techniques had lower sensitivity for subcentimeter implants (42% for PET/CT, 50% for MR-DWI).
Conclusions:
- FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI exhibit similar high accuracy in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis.
- MR-DWI may offer superior detection in the supramesocolic region.
- Both imaging modalities are limited in detecting small peritoneal lesions, necessitating careful interpretation.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
09:18Multianimal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Tumor Measurements in Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Models
Published on: February 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...