Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Design Example01:23

Design Example

The innovation of touch-tone telephony revolutionized the telecommunications industry by replacing the traditional rotary dial with a dual-tone multi-frequency (DTMF) signaling system. This system uses a matrix-style keypad with buttons arranged in four rows and three columns, creating 12 distinct signals each assigned to a pair of frequencies. Each button press results in a simultaneous generation of two sinusoidal tones – one from a low-frequency group (697 to 941 Hz) and one from a...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk of dementia after bloodstream infection-a nationwide propensity score matched cohort study.

Age and ageing·2026
Same author

Multidimensional evaluation of large language models on the AAP in-service examination: Assessing accuracy, calibration, and citation reliability.

PLOS digital health·2026
Same author

Identifying research priorities for post-collision care in the United Kingdom: outcomes and methodological adaptations from the final prioritisation workshop.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Global inventory and audit of road injury data systems: a descriptive study using the Road Injury Chain of Survival Framework.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular systolic function: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing artificial intelligence and clinician estimates.

European heart journal. Digital health·2026
Same author

Identifying research priorities for post-collision care in the United Kingdom: protocol for a road injury priority setting partnership.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2025
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Dropouts in the AB/BA crossover design.

Weang Kee Ho1, John N S Matthews, Robin Henderson

  • 1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Missing data in crossover trials can bias results when data are missing not at random (MNAR). This study shows treatment effect estimates are sensitive to the missing at random (MAR) assumption, proposing a method for MNAR data.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Neuropathic Pain Research

Background:

  • Missing data are a common challenge in clinical trials, including crossover designs.
  • Most existing methods assume data are missing at random (MAR), which may not hold true in practice.
  • When the MAR assumption is violated, data are considered missing not at random (MNAR), posing significant analytical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of assuming MAR when data are actually MNAR on treatment effect estimates in crossover trials.
  • To propose a novel method for estimating treatment effects under MNAR conditions using the no carryover effect assumption.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity of treatment effect estimates to the MAR assumption in a real-world clinical trial setting.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies to assess the bias introduced by MAR assumption under MNAR scenarios.
  • Development of a statistical approach leveraging the no carryover effect assumption for MNAR data.
  • Application of the proposed method to a crossover trial comparing treatments for neuropathic pain.

Main Results:

  • Estimates of treatment effects in crossover trials are significantly sensitive to the MAR assumption when data are MNAR.
  • The proposed method allows for valid estimation of treatment effects even when data are MNAR.
  • Analysis of the neuropathic pain trial demonstrated the practical implications of MNAR data on treatment effect estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The MAR assumption is often inappropriate for missing data in crossover trials, leading to biased treatment effect estimates.
  • The proposed method offers a robust solution for handling MNAR data in crossover trials by utilizing the no carryover effect assumption.
  • Researchers should carefully consider the missing data mechanism and employ appropriate methods to ensure valid inferences in clinical trial analysis.