Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced penetrance in genetic ALS/FTD spectrum disorders: implications for genetic counseling, predictive testing and treatment.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Blood DNA Methylation Changes During Weight-Loss Intervention and Dementia Progression Risk.

Research square·2026
Same author

Genome wide association study meta-analysis of neuropathologic lesions of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in a multi-site autopsy cohort.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

From aging to Alzheimer's disease: concordant brain DNA methylation changes in late life.

Genome medicine·2026
Same author

A Common <i>CD36</i> Variant and the Genetic Landscape of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Individuals of African Ancestry.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Blood DNA methylation signature of cognitive reserve moderates the association between CSF tau pathology and memory in prodromal Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

Reconsidering association testing methods using single-variant test statistics as alternatives to pooling tests for

Daniel D Kinnamon1, Ray E Hershberger, Eden R Martin

  • 1Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.

Plos One
|February 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Pooling rare variants in association tests can reduce power. Methods using single-variant statistics are more robust and offer comparable or greater power for detecting genetic associations with rare variants in sequence data.

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Statistical Genetics
  • Genomic Association Studies
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Burden tests pooling rare variants are used for case-control studies with sequence data.
  • These pooling tests are susceptible to masking signals from risk variants due to neutral or protective variants.
  • Previous dismissals of single-variant test statistics for locus-wide inference were based on unrealistic assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of locus-wide inference methods using nonnegative single-variant test statistics against established pooling tests.
  • To evaluate these methods under more realistic conditions, including complex genetic models and data imperfections.

Main Methods:

  • Analytic derivations for a simplified model with one risk and one neutral rare variant.
  • Extensive simulations using realistic parameters for minor allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium, disease models, and missing genotypes.
  • Comparison of power between single-variant test statistics and pooling tests.

Main Results:

  • Analytic results showed pooling tests were less powerful than Bonferroni-corrected single-variant tests in simple models.
  • Simulations demonstrated that single-variant test statistics methods consistently achieved comparable or greater power than pooling tests.
  • Specific single-variant methods showed superior power in models with only rare risk variants.

Conclusions:

  • Single-variant test statistics provide a robust and powerful framework for locus-wide association inference with rare variants in sequence data.
  • These methods are more effective than pooling tests, especially when neutral or protective variants are present.
  • Reconsideration of single-variant test statistics is recommended for developing powerful association tests for rare variants.