Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural correlates of vicarious reward processing and peer victimization experiences in late childhood.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2024
Same author

Angry or neutral, it does not matter to me: Implicit processing of facial emotions is not related to peer victimization experiences.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Delay discounting in adolescence depends on whom you wait for: Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2024
Same author

Here Comes Revenge: Peer Victimization Relates to Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Exclusion.

Research on child and adolescent psychopathology·2024
Same author

Adapting to uncertainty: The role of anxiety and fear of negative evaluation in learning in social and non-social contexts.

Journal of affective disorders·2024
Same author

Growing Up Together in Society (GUTS): A team science effort to predict societal trajectories in adolescence and young adulthood.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

There's something about a fair split: intentionality moderates context-based fairness considerations in social

Sina Radke1, Berna Güroğlu, Ellen R A de Bruijn

  • 1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. s.radke@donders.ru.nl

Plos One
|February 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary

People reject unfair offers more when intentionally chosen over fair ones. This study shows intention and context both influence social decision-making in fairness judgments.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Fairness is a key motivator in social interactions.
  • The Ultimatum Game is a standard paradigm for studying fairness and decision-making.
  • Previous research has not fully disentangled intention from context in fairness judgments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of intentionality versus context in responding to unfair offers.
  • To differentiate between intention-based and context-based decision-making processes.
  • To explore the additive nature of fairness considerations in cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Ultimatum Game with manipulated proposer control over offer selection.
  • Varied the context of available outcomes for offers.
  • Compared rejection rates based on intentional vs. computer-controlled unfair offers.

Main Results:

  • Rejection rates were significantly higher for intentionally chosen unfair offers compared to computer-selected ones.
  • Rejection rates were sensitive to the context of the offers presented.
  • Evidence supports both intention-based and context-based decision-making in fairness evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • Intentionality plays a crucial role in fairness considerations, even in simple decision scenarios.
  • Both intention- and context-based factors contribute additively to social decision-making.
  • Fairness judgments may involve distinct cognitive processing levels with varied developmental paths.