Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026
A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)
Published on: February 7, 2025
Early clinical indicators of developmental outcome in abusive head trauma
Mary V Greiner1, Alice P Lawrence, Paul Horn
1Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. mary.greiner@cchmc.org
Insights
Early seizures and intubation in abusive head trauma (AHT) predict poorer developmental outcomes. All children with AHT require close developmental monitoring for optimal prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric neurology
- Developmental pediatrics
- Child abuse research
Background:
- Abusive head trauma (AHT) is a severe form of child maltreatment.
- Early clinical indicators may predict long-term developmental prognosis in AHT survivors.
- Understanding these indicators is crucial for timely intervention and support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the developmental prognostic significance of early clinical indicators in children with abusive head trauma.
- To identify specific early post-injury factors associated with developmental outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 71 children diagnosed with AHT.
- Data collected on early clinical features: seizures, intubation, and PICU admission.
- Developmental assessment using Capute Scales (CAT) and CLAMS during follow-up.
Main Results:
- Children with early post-traumatic seizures scored significantly lower on developmental tests.
- Patients requiring intubation showed poorer developmental outcomes compared to those not intubated.
- PICU admission was also associated with lower developmental scores.
Conclusions:
- Early clinical factors like seizures and intubation requirement are linked to adverse developmental outcomes in AHT.
- Close developmental follow-up is recommended for all AHT patients, irrespective of PICU admission.
Purpose:
The purpose of the study was to determine the developmental prognostic significance of early clinical indicators in abusive head trauma.
Methods:
Seventy-one children were diagnosed with abusive head trauma and followed in a post-injury growth and development clinic. A retrospective chart review was completed to gather clinical features at the time of injury, including presence or absence of early post-traumatic seizures, presence or absence of intubation, and presence or absence of pediatric intensive care unit admission. Children then underwent developmental testing with use of the Capute Scales of the Cognitive Adaptive Test (CAT) and the Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CLAMS) during follow-up clinic visits. Clinical features at initial injury were compared to developmental outcome.
Results:
Thirty-four of 71 patients with seizures during their admission hospitalization scored significantly lower on follow-up developmental testing than patients who did not have seizures. Twenty-one of 71 patients who required intubation scored lower on developmental testing than patients who did not require intubation. Thirty-five of 71 patients who required pediatric intensive care unit admission scored lower on developmental testing than patients who did not require pediatric intensive care unit admission.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates that clinical factors at the time of injury, such as early post-traumatic seizures and intubation requirement, are associated with poorer developmental outcome. This study also suggests that close developmental follow-up should be obtained for all children with abusive head trauma, regardless of whether or not the child was admitted to the PICU.
