Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) in regulatory submissions and research: a landscape analysis.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same author

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

Sequential invitations to FOBT screening and colorectal cancer incidence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Powering RCTs for Marginal Effects With GLMs Using Prognostic Score Adjustment.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Transportability to the European Population of Efficacy of Belumosudil as Compared With Physician's Choice of Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease.

Transplantation and cellular therapy·2026
Same author

Machine learning to optimize precision in the analysis of randomized trials: A journey in pre-specified, yet data-adaptive learning.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Consistent causal effect estimation under dual misspecification and implications for confounder selection procedures.

Susan Gruber1, Mark J van der Laan2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge 820, Boston, MA, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|February 28, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explains effective confounder selection for causal effect estimation in observational studies. It highlights methods that ensure accurate estimates, even with model misspecification, by focusing on estimator quality.

Keywords:
TMLEcausal effectcausal inferencecollaborative double robustnesscollaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimationconfounder selectiondual misspecificationpropensity score

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Confounder selection is critical for accurate causal effect estimation in observational studies.
  • Existing methods for confounder selection have limitations.
  • The performance of confounder selection procedures can be guided by the quality of the exposure effect estimator.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a theoretical framework for effective confounder selection.
  • To explain and support the findings of Vansteelandt et al. regarding confounder selection strategies.
  • To underscore the importance of estimator quality and robustness in confounder selection.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraging collaborative targeted minimum loss-based learning (TM L) for a general theoretical framework.
  • Analyzing the performance of confounder selection procedures under specific conditions, including dual model misspecification.
  • Comparing proposed methods with existing estimators.

Main Results:

  • A linearity condition allows for consistent estimation even with dual misspecification of confounder models.
  • The proposed confounder selection procedure's performance is directly linked to the quality of the exposure effect estimator.
  • Desirable estimators should yield valid confidence intervals and be robust to dual misspecification.

Conclusions:

  • Effective confounder selection requires a focus on the quality of the resulting estimate.
  • Robust estimators that are resilient to dual misspecification are crucial for valid causal inference.
  • The findings support strategies that prioritize estimator performance and reliability.