Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

N95 filtering facepiece respirator fit assessment outcomes by gender, age, race, and facial hair in a community population sample.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026
Same author

Repurposing the liquid-based Pap test for the detection of ovarian cancer protein biomarkers.

Clinical proteomics·2026
Same author

The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Nicotine Withdrawal Symptoms.

International journal of mental health and addiction·2026
Same author

Inverse Association between the ω-3 Index and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio: Pooled Results from Four Supplementation Trials.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and adiposity in the UK Biobank Cohort: a cross-sectional and longitudinal prospective analysis.

The British journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Demographic Associations with GPS-Inferred Routine Activity Spaces: Data from the Everyday Environments and Experiences (E3) Study.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

Evaluating methods for the analysis of rare variants in sequence data.

Alexander Luedtke1, Scott Powers2, Ashley Petersen3

  • 1Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

BMC Proceedings
|March 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Four statistical methods for analyzing rare genetic variants in next-generation sequencing data showed significant limitations. These methods struggled with high false-positive rates and low true-positive rates, hindering accurate gene discovery.

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genomics

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) generates vast amounts of data, necessitating robust statistical methods for rare variant analysis.
  • Existing rare variant statistical methods lack direct comparisons on real sequence data, creating a need for practical guidance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of four recently proposed rare variant statistical methods using simulated phenotype and NGS data.
  • To provide practical advice on analytical strategies for rare variant analysis in genetic studies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of four rare variant methods: combined multivariate and collapsing (CMC), weighted sum (WS), proportion regression (PR), and cumulative minor allele test (CMAT).
  • Utilized simulated phenotype and next-generation sequencing data from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17).

Main Results:

  • All analyzed methods demonstrated serious practical limitations in identifying causal genes, with true discovery rates below 5%.
  • Methods exhibited inflated false-positive error rates due to population stratification and gametic phase disequilibrium.
  • Observed true-positive rates were low (<19%) for all four methods, leading to poor discriminatory ability.

Conclusions:

  • Current rare variant statistical methods have significant limitations for causal gene identification with NGS data.
  • Population stratification and gametic phase disequilibrium are critical factors contributing to errors in rare variant analysis and require further research.