Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)
Published on: August 21, 2016
Identification of functional genetic variation in exome sequence analysis
Andrew Jaffe1, Genevieve Wojcik1, Audrey Chu1
1Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Predicting the functional impact of genetic variants is crucial. Four computational tools showed modest agreement in classifying variant effects, highlighting the need for improved algorithms in genomic analysis.
Area of Science:
- Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
- Molecular Genetics
Background:
- High-throughput sequencing generates vast amounts of genetic variant data.
- Interpreting the functional significance of these variants for protein function remains a challenge.
- Accurate prediction of variant effects is essential for understanding genetic disease and guiding research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of four widely used algorithms (SIFT, PolyPhen, MAPP, VarioWatch) for predicting the functional impact of genetic variants.
- To assess the level of agreement among these prediction tools when applied to a set of variants from the 1000 Genomes Project.
- To identify potential limitations and areas for improvement in current variant effect prediction methodologies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the pilot3 study of the 1000 Genomes Project (Genetic Analysis Workshop 17).
- Applied four distinct variant prediction programs: SIFT, PolyPhen, MAPP, and VarioWatch.
- Analyzed predictions for variants across 101 genes without prior knowledge of the simulation model.
Main Results:
- Modest agreement was observed between the four prediction programs, with concordance rates ranging from 59.4% to 71.4%.
- A small proportion of variants (3.5%) were consistently classified as deleterious across all four tools.
- A slightly larger proportion (10.9%) were consistently predicted as tolerated by all programs, indicating significant discrepancies in predictions.
Conclusions:
- Current computational tools for predicting variant functional impact exhibit limited agreement, suggesting variability in their underlying algorithms and data sources.
- The modest concordance highlights the need for further development and validation of prediction methods to improve the accuracy and reliability of variant effect assessments.
- More robust and integrated approaches are required to accurately interpret the biological significance of genetic variants in large-scale genomic studies.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles, which...

