Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents
Caroline Bennette1, Andrew Vickers
1Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7630, USA.
Background:
Quantiles are a staple of epidemiologic research: in contemporary epidemiologic practice, continuous variables are typically categorized into tertiles, quartiles and quintiles as a means to illustrate the relationship between a continuous exposure and a binary outcome.
Discussion:
In this paper we argue that this approach is highly problematic and present several potential alternatives. We also discuss the perceived drawbacks of these newer statistical methods and the possible reasons for their slow adoption by epidemiologists.
Summary:
The use of quantiles is often inadequate for epidemiologic research with continuous variables.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Causality in Epidemiology
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Cochran's Q Test

