Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models.

Evaluation and program planning·2007
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

Advances in collaborative evaluation.

Liliana Rodríguez-Campos1

  • 1Department of Measurement and Research, College of Education, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL 33620-7750, United States. liliana@usf.edu

Evaluation and Program Planning
|March 2, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collaborative evaluation enhances information access, quality, and creative problem-solving. This approach, gaining popularity, strengthens evaluation practice by uniting diverse stakeholders and updating conceptual frameworks for sound practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Evaluation Studies

Background:

  • Collaborative evaluation offers advantages in information access, quality, problem-solving, and receptivity.
  • It has grown in popularity alongside participatory, empowerment, and utilization-focused evaluation approaches.
  • It brings together diverse stakeholders to share knowledge on collaborative evaluation practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To update existing conceptual frameworks for collaborative evaluation.
  • To discuss key advances in collaborative evaluation practice.
  • To clarify and facilitate engagement in sound collaborative evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of existing literature on collaborative evaluation.
  • Conceptual framework development and updates.
  • Discussion of practical advancements in collaborative evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Updated conceptual frameworks distinguishing collaborative evaluation from other approaches.
  • Identification of key advances and best practices in collaborative evaluation.
  • Clarification of the strategic use of collaboration in evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Collaborative evaluation is a valuable approach for improving evaluation outcomes.
  • Continuous development of conceptual frameworks is essential for advancing the field.
  • Further engagement with collaborative evaluation principles can strengthen evaluation practice globally.