Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Comparison of adjustment methods for stratified two-sample tests in the context of ROC analysis
Kelly H Zou1, Martin O Carlsson, Ching-Ray Yu
1Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA. kelly.zou@pfizer.com
Abstract:
We compare several nonparametric and parametric weighting methods for the adjustment of the effect of strata. In particular, we focus on the adjustment methods in the context of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Nonparametrically, rank-based van Elteren's test and inverse-variance (IV) weighting using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are examined. Parametrically, the stratified t-test and IV AUC weighted method are applied based on a binormal monotone transformation model. Stratum-specific, pooled, and adjusted estimates are obtained. The pooled and adjusted AUCs are estimated. We illustrate and compare these weighting methods on a multi-center diagnostic trial and through extensive Monte-Carlo simulations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...

