Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

An Efficient and Reproducible Protocol for Distraction Osteogenesis in a Rat Model Leading to a Functional Regenerated Femur
Published on: October 23, 2017
Randomised trial comparing bone remodelling around two uncemented stems using modified Gruen zones
René H M ten Broeke1, Roel P M Hendrickx, Pieter Leffers
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. r.ten.broeke@mumc.nl
A modified Gruen zone analysis in dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) revealed significant bone mineral density (BMD) differences between hip implant stems. This method improves comparisons of bone remodelling around total hip arthroplasty implants.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Assessing bone remodelling around total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial for implant longevity.
- Current methods using dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and standard Regions of Interest (ROI), like Gruen zones, limit comparative analysis of different uncemented stem designs.
- Standardized ROI definitions are needed for accurate evaluation of implant-induced bone mineral density (BMD) changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of a modified Gruen zone approach versus standard Gruen zones for assessing BMD changes around two uncemented THA stems.
- To determine if the modified ROI method can reveal significant differences in bone preservation between Symax(TM) and Omnifit(®) stems.
- To evaluate the impact of proximal coating on bone remodelling using DEXA over a two-year follow-up.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 49 patients comparing Symax(TM) (n=25) and Omnifit(®) (n=24) uncemented stems with proximal coating.
- DEXA scans were used to measure BMD at two-year follow-up.
- BMD analysis was performed using both standard Gruen zones and a modified approach ensuring equal ROI length and position (zones 1 and 7) for direct comparison of cancellous and cortical bone.
Main Results:
- The modified Gruen zones yielded lower BMD values for the Omnifit(®) stem in zone 7 (3.6% decrease, p<0.05) compared to standard zones.
- The modified ROI analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in bone preservation favouring the Symax(TM) implant, a difference not apparent with standard Gruen zones.
- This adaptation highlighted significant bone preservation differences between the two stem designs in zone 7.
Conclusions:
- The modified Gruen zone method provides a more accurate and sensitive assessment of bone remodelling around THA implants.
- This adaptation is essential for valid comparisons of bone preservation between different uncemented stem designs.
- The study recommends the use of modified Gruen zones for future DEXA-based assessments of bone remodelling in THA research.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
Bone Remodeling and Repair

