Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Mechanical Protein Functions01:58

Mechanical Protein Functions

Proteins perform many mechanical functions in a cell. These proteins can be classified into two general categories- proteins that generate mechanical forces and proteins that are subjected to mechanical forces. Proteins providing mechanical support to the structure of the cell, such as keratin, are subjected to mechanical force, whereas proteins involved in cell movement and transport of molecules across cell membranes, such as an ion pump, are examples of generating mechanical force. 
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Integrated NMR/MD investigation reveals differences after reweighting in conformational ensembles of GAAG and GCAA tetraloops.

RNA (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Effects of residue substitutions on the cellular abundance of proteins.

eLife·2026
Same author

StruCloze: A Unified Framework for Backmapping and Inpainting Biomolecule Structures.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A Stickiness Scale for Disordered Proteins.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Transient tertiary structure in intrinsically disordered proteins revealed by multithermal enhanced sampling.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data.

Kresten Lindorff-Larsen1, Paul Maragakis, Stefano Piana

  • 1DE Shaw Research, New York, New York, United States of America.

Plos One
|March 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Molecular dynamics simulations use force fields to model biomolecules. Recent protein force fields accurately capture molecular structure and dynamics, advancing computational biology.

More Related Videos

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies
07:31

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies

Published on: September 1, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies
07:31

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies

Published on: September 1, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are crucial for studying biological macromolecules at atomic resolution.
  • The accuracy of MD simulations heavily relies on the quality of the underlying protein force fields.
  • Evaluating and improving protein force fields is essential for reliable computational modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the performance of eight different protein force fields.
  • To assess the accuracy of force fields in describing protein structure, fluctuations, and folding.
  • To compare simulation results with extensive experimental data across various timescales.

Main Methods:

  • Performed extensive molecular dynamics simulations using eight distinct protein force fields.
  • Compared simulation data with experimental Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) data for folded proteins.
  • Analyzed peptide structures to quantify force field biases towards secondary structure types (helical vs. sheet).
  • Assessed the folding capabilities of force fields for small proteins with different secondary structures.

Main Results:

  • Recent protein force fields demonstrate improved accuracy in reproducing experimental data.
  • Evaluated force fields show good performance in describing protein structure and dynamics.
  • Identified specific strengths and weaknesses of different force fields regarding secondary structure prediction and folding.
  • Simulations reached previously inaccessible timescales, providing more robust comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Protein force fields have significantly improved over time.
  • The latest generation of force fields provides a reliable description of many protein structural and dynamical properties.
  • Continued development and validation of force fields are necessary for advancing molecular simulations.