Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Long-term follow-up on high-rate cut-off programming for implantable cardioverter defibrillators in primary
Nicolas Clementy1, Bertrand Pierre, Bénédicte Lallemand
1Cardiology B Department, Service de Cardiologie B, Trousseau Hospital, François Rabelais University, 37044 Tours, France. nclementy@yahoo.fr
Insights
High-rate cut-off programming for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with reduced ejection fraction is safe long-term. This approach significantly lowers ICD shocks, which can be harmful in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- High-rate cut-off programming may decrease ICD therapies but its long-term impact is unclear, leading to underutilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of high-rate cut-off (220 b.p.m.) shock-only ICD programming in primary prevention patients.
- To assess the long-term consequences of this programming strategy on morbidity and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 365 patients with cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction receiving an ICD for primary prevention.
- Devices programmed with a shock-only zone >220 b.p.m. and a monitoring zone of 170-220 b.p.m.
- Median follow-up of 40 months.
Main Results:
- 41 patients (11.2%) received appropriate shocks; 24 (6.6%) received inappropriate shocks.
- 84% of patients experienced no ICD shocks during follow-up.
- Ventricular tachycardia episodes were recorded in the monitoring zone in 11.8% of patients, with only 1.9% symptomatic.
Conclusions:
- High-rate cut-off (220 b.p.m.) shock-only ICD programming is safe in the long term for primary prevention patients with reduced ejection fraction.
- This strategy results in a very low rate of ICD discharges, avoiding potentially deleterious shocks in this vulnerable population.
Aims:
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are efficient in reducing mortality in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. High-rate cut-off programming may be effective in reducing appropriate and inappropriate therapies, but as the long-term consequences on morbidity and mortality remain unclear, it is underutilized.
Methods And Results:
We prospectively studied 365 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 10 years), with ischaemic (63%) or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 25 ± 7%), who were implanted with an ICD in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (41% single chamber, 31% dual chamber, and 28% biventricular). All devices were programmed with a shock-only zone over 220 beats per minute (b.p.m.) and a monitoring zone between 170 and 220 b.p.m. During a median follow-up of 40 months, 41 patients received appropriate shocks (11.2%) and 24 inappropriate shocks (6.6%). Then, 306 patients never experienced any ICD shock (84%). Inappropriate discharges were related to supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in 10 patients, and noise/oversensing in 14 patients. Ventricular tachycardia episodes, sustained or not, were recorded in the monitoring zone in 43 patients (11.8%). Seven of these patients were symptomatic (1.9%), without lethal consequence. Sixty-two patients (17%) died: 35 from end-stage heart failure, 1 from unexplained sudden death, and 26 from a documented non-cardiac cause.
Conclusion:
High-rate cut-off (220 b.p.m.) shock-only ICD programming, in primary prevention patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, appeared to be safe during a long-term follow-up. It also resulted in a very low rate of discharges, which are known to be deleterious in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

