Detection and quantification of Leptospira interrogans in hamster and rat kidney samples: immunofluorescent imprints

Adenizar D Chagas-Junior1, Caroline L R da Silva, Luciane Marieta Soares

  • 1Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Plos One
|March 7, 2012
PubMed

Insights

The immunofluorescent imprint method (IM) effectively detects and quantifies leptospires, offering a viable alternative to real-time PCR (qPCR) for leptospirosis research and clinical management.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology
  • Diagnostic Methods

Background:

  • Leptospirosis diagnosis is hindered by poor performance of current direct detection methods.
  • Accurate detection and quantification of leptospires are crucial for clinical management and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of real-time PCR (qPCR) and the immunofluorescent imprint method (IM) for detecting and quantifying leptospires.
  • To evaluate these methods in both acute and chronic experimental leptospirosis models.

Main Methods:

  • Kidney samples from infected rats (chronic) and hamsters (acute) were analyzed.
  • Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni was used to establish infections.
  • Detection and quantification were performed using culture isolation, qPCR targeting the lipL32 gene, and IM.

Main Results:

  • A significant positive correlation was observed between qPCR and IM quantification in both acute and chronic infection models (P<0.05).
  • IM demonstrated reliable performance for both detection and quantification of leptospires.

Conclusions:

  • The immunofluorescent imprint method (IM) is a viable alternative for leptospire detection and quantification.
  • IM is particularly useful when real-time PCR (qPCR) is not feasible for leptospirosis diagnosis.

Related Concept Videos