Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Long-term independent predictors of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Mauro Toniolo1, Gabriele Zanotto, Andrea Rossi
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes for heart failure patients. Nonischemic cause, left bundle-branch block, and lower baseline LVESV/BSA predict positive CRT response and better long-term prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a key treatment for refractory heart failure.
- Long-term predictors of CRT response and patient outcomes require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify baseline characteristics predicting positive response to CRT.
- To evaluate the impact of these predictors on long-term mortality, morbidity, and ventricular function recovery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective follow-up study of 211 heart failure patients receiving CRT.
- Analysis of baseline clinical characteristics including cause of heart failure, bundle-branch block type, and LVESV/BSA.
- Evaluation of long-term prognosis, survival, and rehospitalization rates.
Main Results:
- Nonischemic heart failure etiology, left bundle-branch block, and LVESV/BSA ≤ 106 ml/m² were independent predictors of CRT response.
- Reduced LVESV/BSA post-CRT correlated with improved survival and decreased heart failure rehospitalization.
Conclusions:
- Patient selection for CRT can be improved by considering heart failure cause, bundle-branch block type, and baseline LVESV/BSA.
- Optimizing patient selection enhances the likelihood of benefiting from CRT.
Aims:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is currently considered an important breakthrough in the treatment of selected patients with refractory heart failure. However, long-term predictors of mortality, morbidity and time to recovery of ventricular function for those patients who respond positively to CRT remain poorly investigated.
Methods:
This is a retrospective follow-up study involving one hospital. Between August 2004 and October 2008, 211 consecutive patients with refractory heart failure received a CRT device in the Cardiology Division of Ospedale Civile Maggiore in Verona. The clinical characteristics studied were age, sex, heart rhythm, left ventricular end-systolic volume/body surface area (LVESV/BSA), left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS duration, type of bundle-branch block, cause, New York Heart Failure Association functional class, pharmacological therapy and lead position. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of several baseline characteristics on long-term prognosis in heart failure patients treated with CRT.
Results:
Nonischemic cause, left bundle-branch block and a basal LVESV/BSA of 106 ml/m or less were the only independent predictors of a positive response to CRT (P < 0.005). Additionally, a reduction in LVESV/BSA after CRT was associated both with increased survival and reduced rehospitalization for heart failure (P < 0.005).
Conclusion:
A better selection of patients on the basis of cause, type of bundle-branch block and basal LVESV/BSA can increase the number of patients that would benefit from CRT.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
