Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Adjusting confounders in ranking biomarkers: a model-based ROC approach
Tao Yu1, Jialiang Li, Shuangge Ma
1University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
Abstract:
High-throughput studies have been extensively conducted in the research of complex human diseases. As a representative example, consider gene-expression studies where thousands of genes are profiled at the same time. An important objective of such studies is to rank the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers (e.g. gene expressions) for predicting outcome variables while properly adjusting for confounding effects from low-dimensional clinical risk factors and environmental exposures. Existing approaches are often fully based on parametric or semi-parametric models and target evaluating estimation significance as opposed to diagnostic accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) approaches can be employed to tackle this problem. However, existing ROC ranking methods focus on biomarkers only and ignore effects of confounders. In this article, we propose a model-based approach which ranks the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers using ROC measures with a proper adjustment of confounding effects. To this end, three different methods for constructing the underlying regression models are investigated. Simulation study shows that the proposed methods can accurately identify biomarkers with additional diagnostic power beyond confounders. Analysis of two cancer gene-expression studies demonstrates that adjusting for confounders can lead to substantially different rankings of genes.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
