Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...

Ethical Standards II

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...

Ethical Standards I

Ethical Standards I

The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...

Professional Values

Professional Values

Nurses are responsible for caring for patients during birth, death, illness, and healing. Professional values guide the decisions and actions that nurses make in their careers. If nurses know the decisions and actions to take, providing patients with exceptional care is possible.
The values that are the foundation of the nursing profession are altruism, autonomy, human dignity, and social justice.
First, altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well-being of others without personal...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ethical Conduct of Research with Migrants and Refugees: A Systematic Qualitative Review of Ethics Guidelines.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2026

Same author

Vulnerability in human research.

Monash bioethics review·2020

Same author

Beneficence as a principle in human research.

Monash bioethics review·2016

Same author

Justice in human research ethics. A conceptual and practical guide.

Monash bioethics review·2013

Same author

Protecting health information privacy in research: how much law do Australians need?

The Medical journal of Australia·2005

Same author

Confidentiality and privacy: beyond legal duties.

The Medical journal of Australia·2003

Same journal

Autonomy under uncertainty: the structural limits of substituted judgment in clinical practice.

Monash bioethics review·2026

Same journal

Clinical ethical issues in paediatric practice: exploring the awareness and opinions of paediatricians in order to grow paediatric clinical ethics services in a Malaysian teaching hospital.

Monash bioethics review·2026

Same journal

Should Australia implement regulatory changes to include Normothermic Regional Perfusion in organ donation and change our definition of death?

Monash bioethics review·2026

Same journal

The challenge of forming solidarity in Germany as a culturally diverse society during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Monash bioethics review·2026

Same journal

Changing Discourse on In Vitro Gametogenesis: Expectation, Scientific Reality, and the Ethics of Hype.

Monash bioethics review·2026

Same journal

Public engagement and bioethics as natural allies.

Monash bioethics review·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Contextualising merit and integrity within human research.

Ian Pieper¹, Colin J H Thomson

¹Queensland Health. pieper@live.co.uk

Monash Bioethics Review

|March 9, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Research ethics committees must ensure research projects offer significant merit. Demonstrating a project

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Area of Science:

Human Research Ethics
Research Integrity
Scientific Merit

Background:

Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) in Australia face scrutiny for potentially overstepping into scientific review.
Ethical review necessitates ensuring research is worthwhile and contributes to knowledge or welfare.
A perceived lack of research merit can undermine the ethical justification for using human participants, tissue, or data.

Purpose of the Study:

To clarify the ethical imperative for demonstrating research merit to HRECs.
To guide researchers in developing protocols that highlight the value and integrity of their proposed studies.
To delineate the distinct yet interconnected roles of research merit, integrity, and ethical review.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of ethical guidelines and committee responsibilities.
Exploration of the relationship between research merit, scientific integrity, and ethical considerations.
Guidance on protocol development for demonstrating research worthiness.

Main Results:

Research merit is a foundational ethical consideration for HRECs.
Clear demonstration of a project's value is crucial for ethical approval.
Researchers must proactively justify the significance of their work.

Conclusions:

Ethical research requires demonstrable merit that benefits society or knowledge.
Researchers have a responsibility to articulate the worthiness of their studies.
Effective HREC review balances ethical oversight with scientific validity.