Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Applying Hyperspectral Reflectance Imaging to Investigate the Palettes and the Techniques of Painters
Published on: June 18, 2021
Performance of three reflectance calibration methods for airborne hyperspectral spectrometer data
Tomoaki Miura1, Alfredo R Huete
1Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1910 East-West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA.
The continuous panel (CP) method offers the most accurate hyperspectral data calibration for airborne spectrometers, outperforming reflectance mode (RM) and linear-interpolation (LI) methods. This technique ensures reliable reflectance factor retrieval across various flight durations and times of day.
Area of Science:
- Remote Sensing
- Spectroscopy
- Geospatial Analysis
Background:
- Accurate conversion of airborne hyperspectral data to reflectance factors is crucial for quantitative analysis.
- Existing calibration methods like reflectance mode (RM) and linear-interpolation (LI) exhibit limitations in accuracy and consistency.
- Variations in time of day and flight duration significantly impact the performance of these calibration methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize and compare the performance and accuracy of three airborne hyperspectral data calibration methods.
- To identify the most reliable method for converting raw spectrometer data to reflectance factors.
- To provide quantitative estimates of uncertainty for the most effective calibration method.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated the reflectance mode (RM) method, involving pre-flight calibration against a white reference panel.
- Assessed the linear-interpolation (LI) method, using pre- and post-flight reference panel readings.
- Investigated the continuous panel (CP) method, employing a multi-band radiometer for continuous reference measurements during flight.
Main Results:
- The RM method produced biased and distorted reflectance spectra, highly dependent on time of day and flight duration.
- The LI method yielded precise but inaccurate reflectance spectra with biases varying by flight duration.
- The CP method demonstrated superior accuracy and reliability, providing consistent reflectance factor retrievals across different conditions with an estimated uncertainty of 0.0025 ± 0.0005 reflectance units.
Conclusions:
- The continuous panel (CP) method is the most accurate and reliable approach for airborne hyperspectral reflectance calibration.
- The RM method is suitable only for very short flights (<15 min) near solar noon.
- The LI method requires flight durations under 30 minutes for reasonable accuracy, while CP is effective for longer campaigns (1-2 hours).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) Infrared Spectroscopy: Overview
The ATR process begins by directing a beam...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

