Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods01:19

Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods

A medication’s effectiveness largely depends on its appropriate dosage and the route of administration. Dosage ensures that a sufficient drug concentration is maintained in the bloodstream to elicit the desired therapeutic effect without causing toxicity. The route of administration affects the drug's bioavailability, rate of absorption, and onset of action, which are crucial for achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes. Drug dosage calculations are critical to tailoring therapy to individual...
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose01:01

Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose

Fixed-dose regimens are a common approach to administer drugs to achieve and maintain desired levels of the drug in the body. In this dosing strategy, a specific amount of medication is given at regular intervals, often multiple times a day, to ensure a consistent drug concentration in the bloodstream.
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypoxia suppresses platelet activity through GPVI downregulation but paradoxically enhances arterial thrombosis via elevated vWF.

Cardiovascular research·2026
Same author

Quality assurance incorporating artificial intelligence-generated reference contours in a phase II radiotherapy trial.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Feasibility and physiological effects of a combined exercise and nutritional intervention in older adults with cancer under catabolic stress.

Frontiers in physiology·2026
Same author

External validation of the graded prognostic assessment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA).

Radiation oncology journal·2026
Same author

Development of MKI-3: A Potent and Selective MASTL Inhibitor with Improved Efficacy for Cancer Treatment.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Dose calculation accuracy with extended CT scales near metal: phantom-patient evaluation using a beam-metal overlap metric.

Radiation oncology (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Modified dose difference method for comparing dose distributions.

Jino Bak1, Jin Hwa Choi, Jae-Sung Kim

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|March 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary

A new modified dose difference (MDdiff) evaluation method offers a quantitative approach for comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance dose distributions. This method resolves issues found in the gamma evaluation, providing similar results.

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy
  • Radiation Oncology

Background:

  • Quantitative comparison of 2D dose distributions is crucial for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA).
  • Existing methods like the gamma evaluation have limitations.
  • A novel evaluation technique is needed to address these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and describe the modified dose difference (MDdiff) evaluation method.
  • To compare the effectiveness of MDdiff against the established gamma method for IMRT QA.
  • To highlight the advantages of MDdiff in resolving issues associated with gamma evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • The MDdiff formalism was defined using a dimensionless parameter β(r)(DG)(r(-->)(r)).
  • Both MDdiff and the gamma method were applied to patient-specific IMRT QA datasets.
  • Evaluations involved counting data points meeting specific MDdiff and gamma criteria (MDdiff ≥ (1/2)δD⁰, γ ≥ 1) using a C++ program.

Main Results:

  • The MDdiff method demonstrated a similar tendency to the gamma evaluation method in assessing dose distributions.
  • The MDdiff tool provides a quantitative comparison of two dose distributions, akin to the gamma evaluation.
  • The MDdiff method successfully resolved several identified problems inherent in the gamma evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • The modified dose difference (MDdiff) evaluation is a viable and effective quantitative tool for IMRT QA.
  • MDdiff offers an alternative to the gamma method, addressing its limitations.
  • This new method enhances the accuracy and reliability of comparing calculated and measured dose distributions in radiotherapy.