Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Receptor interactions in modulating ventilatory activity.

G S Mitchell1, M A Douse, K T Foley

  • 1Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

The American Journal of Physiology
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancement of phrenic long-term facilitation following repetitive acute intermittent hypoxia is blocked by the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose.

American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology·2017
Same author

Daily acute intermittent hypoxia improves breathing function with acute and chronic spinal injury via distinct mechanisms.

Respiratory physiology & neurobiology·2017
Same author

Divergent cAMP signaling differentially regulates serotonin-induced spinal motor plasticity.

Neuropharmacology·2016
Same author

New Pulsed Cold Neutron Beam Line for Fundamental Nuclear Physics at LANSCE.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2016
Same author

Measurement of Parity Violation in np Capture: the NPDGamma Experiment.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2016
Same author

Commissioning of the NPDGamma Detector Array: Counting Statistics in Current Mode Operation and Parity Violation in the Capture of Cold Neutrons on B 4 C and (27) Al.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2016
Same journal

Blood coagulation in fish.

The American journal of physiology·2011
Same journal

Renal tubular reabsorption, metabolic utilization and isomeric fractionation of lactic acid in the dog.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

The inactivation of placental toxin by human serum.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Adrenal function following ovariectomy in the rat.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Capillary permeability; perfusion of frog and guinea pig hind limbs.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Evaluation of protective measures against sunburn.

The American journal of physiology·2010
See all related articles

Understanding sensory receptor interactions is key to predicting ventilatory control responses. Analyzing these complex, non-additive relationships across five domains is crucial for respiratory system research.

Area of Science:

  • Respiratory Physiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • The ventilatory control system relies on sensory receptors (chemoreceptors, mechanoreceptors) for feedback on controlled variables.
  • Ventilatory responses result from complex interactions between receptor groups, central mechanisms, and modulatory inputs.
  • Predicting ventilatory responses is challenging due to the system's complexity, nonlinearity, and dynamic nature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and describe the concept of 'interaction' within the ventilatory control system.
  • To elucidate the five domains of sensory receptor interactions in ventilatory control.
  • To emphasize the necessity of understanding these interactions for a comprehensive view of sensory receptor roles.

Main Methods:

  • Defined 'interaction' as a nonadditive relationship between independent inputs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Described five domains of interaction: algebraic, closed-loop, neural (modulatory, dynamic, range-specific), mechanical, and adaptive.
  • Highlighted the need for studying interactions within the context of the physical system and neural network.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified five distinct domains where interactions within the ventilatory control system manifest.
    • Demonstrated that interactions are nonadditive, involving multiplicative and nonlinear relationships, feedback loops, and central nervous system integration.
    • Showcased how mechanical transformations and adaptive processes contribute to interaction effects.

    Conclusions:

    • A complete understanding of sensory receptor function in ventilatory control necessitates defining their interactions across all five described domains.
    • Investigating these interactions requires detailed knowledge of the respiratory system's mechanics, gas exchange, and neural network properties.
    • Future research must focus on these complex interactions to accurately predict and comprehend ventilatory control mechanisms.