Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
Published on: August 14, 2018
Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic
Guy Baele1, Philippe Lemey, Trevor Bedford
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. guy.baele@rega.kuleuven.be
New methods for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection, path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone (SS) sampling, outperform the harmonic mean estimator (HME) and AICM for complex evolutionary data. These computationally intensive techniques are now available in BEAST software.
Area of Science:
- Bayesian phylogenetics and molecular evolution
- Computational evolutionary biology
- Statistical model selection
Background:
- The harmonic mean estimator (HME) for marginal likelihood estimation in Bayesian phylogenetics is known to perform poorly.
- Newer methods like path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone (SS) sampling show promise but have not been widely adopted due to computational demands and lack of implementation in common software.
- The performance of these advanced methods on complex, real-world evolutionary and population genetic models remains largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance and computational feasibility of PS and SS sampling for complex phylogenetic models.
- To compare PS and SS sampling against HME and a posterior simulation-based analogue of Akaike's information criterion (AICM) using synthetic and real-world data.
- To re-evaluate previous phylogenetic analyses that relied on HME, particularly for models of demographic change and relaxed molecular clocks.
Main Methods:
- Application of path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone (SS) sampling to compare models of demographic change and relaxed molecular clocks.
- Utilized synthetic datasets and three real-world phylogenetic datasets where HME yielded unexpected results.
- Evaluated a posterior simulation-based analogue of Akaike's information criterion through Markov chain Monte Carlo (AICM) as a computationally less intensive alternative.
Main Results:
- Confirmed that the harmonic mean estimator (HME) systematically overestimates marginal likelihoods and leads to unreliable model selection.
- AICM showed improvement over HME but remained partially unreliable for model choice.
- Path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone (SS) sampling substantially outperformed HME and AICM, leading to adjusted conclusions for the reanalyzed real-world datasets.
Conclusions:
- PS and SS sampling are reliable and superior methods for marginal likelihood estimation and model selection in complex Bayesian phylogenetic analyses.
- Previous inferences based on HME for demographic and relaxed clock models may require revision.
- The investigated methods, including PS and SS sampling, are now implemented in the BEAST software package, facilitating their wider application.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Microbial Phylogeny
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy

