Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of an external and internal focus of attention on dual-task performance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2019
Same author

Effects of Changing the Focus of Attention on Accuracy, Acceleration, and Electromyography in Dart Throwing.

International journal of exercise science·2019
Same author

Hand motion analysis for assessment of nursing competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement.

The journal of vascular access·2018
Same author

Do the Principles of Motor Program Editing Apply to Longer Sequences of Rapid Aiming Movements? Part I.

International journal of exercise science·2016
Same author

Do the Principles of Motor Program Editing Apply to Longer Sequences of Rapid Aiming Movements? Part II.

International journal of exercise science·2016
Same author

Concurrent Visual Feedback, Practice Organization, and Spatial Aiming Accuracy in Rapid Movement Sequences.

International journal of exercise science·2016
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Concurrent visual feedback and spatial accuracy in continuous aiming movements.

David E Sherwood1, Kelly K Rothman

  • 1Department of Integrative Physiology, 354 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA. Sherwood@Colorado.edu

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|March 13, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Concurrent visual feedback (CVF) improved aiming accuracy, especially for variable practice targeting. However, removing CVF led to increased errors, highlighting feedback

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Continuous aiming movements are fundamental to many daily tasks.
  • Understanding the role of visual feedback in motor learning is crucial for rehabilitation and performance enhancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of concurrent visual feedback (CVF) on continuous aiming movements under constant and variable practice conditions.
  • To determine how CVF affects movement accuracy and consistency.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed continuous rapid reversal aiming movements using a lever in the sagittal plane.
  • Practice conditions included constant (single target) and variable (alternating targets) practice.
  • Concurrent visual feedback (CVF) was provided for half of the trials in each block.

Main Results:

  • Movements were more accurate and consistent in constant practice than in variable practice.
  • Concurrent visual feedback (CVF) significantly reduced errors across all conditions, particularly for the short target in variable practice.
  • Errors increased markedly when CVF was removed, especially after variable practice.

Conclusions:

  • Concurrent visual feedback (CVF) can modulate the interference caused by alternating targets during aiming movements.
  • The benefits of CVF diminish rapidly once feedback is removed, suggesting reliance on visual cues for error correction.
  • These findings have implications for designing effective motor learning strategies incorporating visual feedback.