Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

10:35
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Large demyelinating lesions: a neurosurgical perspective.
Pravin Salunke1, Ashish Aggarwal, Kirti Gupta
1Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India. drpravin_salunke@yahoo.co.uk
British Journal of Neurosurgery
|March 13, 2012
Summary
Large demyelinating lesions (LDLs) can mimic brain tumors, causing confusion in diagnosis and treatment. Early suspicion and appropriate biopsy are crucial to avoid unnecessary surgery and potential deficits.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Neuro-oncology
- Pathology
Background:
- Large demyelinating lesions (LDLs) can present with symptoms mimicking brain tumors, including seizures and mass effect.
- Radiological features of LDLs are often ambiguous, complicating preoperative diagnosis.
- Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) necessitates timely intervention, but aggressive surgical resection of nervous tissue may lead to avoidable deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of patients initially diagnosed with brain tumors but found to have large demyelinating lesions.
- To highlight the diagnostic challenges and optimal management strategies for LDLs presenting as tumors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case series of eight patients with focal neurological deficits and/or raised ICP initially suspected as tumors.
- Analysis of clinical presentation, radiological findings, and patient outcomes.
- Review of surgical interventions, including biopsy and decompressive surgery.
Main Results:
- All eight patients presented with focal deficits; five had raised ICP, and three experienced seizures.
- Radiological findings included irregular enhancement and concentric rings; four lesions involved the cortex.
- Surgical intervention improved sensorium in all patients, but focal deficits persisted; mortality occurred in three patients.
Conclusions:
- A high index of suspicion for demyelination is essential when encountering unexplained clinical features and atypical radiological findings suggestive of a tumor.
- Dissociation between contrast enhancement and mass effect on imaging warrants consideration of non-neoplastic lesions.
- For patients with minimal mass effect, biopsy is preferred; for those with significant mass effect, decompressive craniectomy and biopsy are recommended over complete resection, especially in eloquent areas.

