Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...

Calmodulin-dependent Signaling

Calmodulin-dependent Signaling

Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium-binding protein in eukaryotes that controls various calcium-regulated cellular processes. It has four calcium-binding sites that bind calcium to form the calcium-calmodulin ( Ca2+-CaM) complex. GPCR stimulation increases the calcium levels in the cells that bind to CaM and induces a conformational change.
The Ca2+-CaM complex does not have enzymatic activity by itself. Instead, the complex binds downstream target proteins, including membrane proteins or enzymes,...

Structure of Cadherins

Structure of Cadherins

The cadherins were one of the first cell adhesion molecules discovered; the term “cadherins” is based on their calcium-dependent adhering properties. The first cadherins discovered on the epithelial, neuronal, and placental cells were named E-cadherin, P-cadherin, and N-cadherin, respectively. These classical cadherins share sequence and structural similarities. Other cadherins, including those involved in cell signaling, are grouped into non-classical cadherins. This diversity of cadherins...

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Epirus-yellow (EY): A dual naked-eye colorimetric and NIR fluorimetric chemosensor for the rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of Sn<sup>2</sup>.

Food chemistry·2026

Same author

Radiolabeled Angiopep-2 Peptide Vector as a Preclinical Platform for Blood-Brain Barrier Targeting: Synthesis, Radiolabeling, and Preliminary In Vivo Biodistribution in Mice.

Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society·2026

Same author

Development of AGT-7: An Innovative <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Labeled Theranostic Platform for Glioblastoma Imaging and Therapy.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Therapeutic Potential of Stylissatin A and Related Cyclic Peptides From Marine Sponges.

Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society·2025

Same author

A systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear medicine techniques in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic brain biopsies.

Neurosurgical review·2025

Same author

Effect of Daily <i>Lactococcus cremoris</i> spp. Consumption Immobilized on Oat Flakes on Blood and Urine Biomarkers: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Pull-down of Calmodulin-binding Proteins

Pull-down of Calmodulin-binding Proteins

Published on: January 23, 2012

Recognition pliability is coupled to structural heterogeneity: a calmodulin intrinsically disordered binding region

Malini Nagulapalli¹, Giacomo Parigi, Jing Yuan

¹Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.

Structure (London, England : 1993)

|March 13, 2012

Summary

Protein interactions need to be flexible for cells to respond to signals. This study shows that the myelin basic protein (MBP) and calmodulin interaction exhibits structural flexibility, explaining how proteins adapt in complex cellular networks.

More Related Videos

Estimation of Structural Sensitivity of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress in Living Cells Using FRET

Estimation of Structural Sensitivity of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress in Living Cells Using FRET

Published on: January 12, 2024

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay

Published on: May 26, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Pull-down of Calmodulin-binding Proteins

Pull-down of Calmodulin-binding Proteins

Published on: January 23, 2012

Estimation of Structural Sensitivity of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress in Living Cells Using FRET

Estimation of Structural Sensitivity of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress in Living Cells Using FRET

Published on: January 12, 2024

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay

Published on: May 26, 2011

Area of Science:

Biochemistry
Structural Biology
Cellular Signaling

Background:

Cellular regulatory networks rely on dynamic protein interactions to process diverse signals.
Understanding the principles of recognition flexibility in protein complexes is crucial but remains challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the structural basis of recognition pliability in protein complexes.
To characterize the interaction between myelin basic protein (MBP(145-165)) and calmodulin, a known promiscuous binding protein.

Main Methods:

Utilized Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to analyze the MBP(145-165)-calmodulin complex.
Employed pseudocontact shifts and residual dipolar couplings to calculate conformational ensembles.

Main Results:

The MBP(145-165)-calmodulin interaction displays significant structural heterogeneity.
Distinct conformational landscapes were observed for different calmodulin-target interactions.
This heterogeneity suggests a mechanism for optimizing transient and promiscuous protein binding.

Conclusions:

Structural heterogeneity is a key feature of adaptable protein interactions in cellular signaling.
This flexibility allows proteins to engage with multiple binding partners and respond to dynamic cellular environments.