Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Woolley and Roe case. A reassessment.

C D Hutter1

  • 1University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.

Anaesthesia
|October 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

A 1953 medical case revealed phenol contamination caused paralysis after spinal anesthesia. Re-examination identified the probable contamination source, explaining patient paralysis and other similar incidents.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the block for caesarean section.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2004
Same author

Dysbaric osteonecrosis: a reassessment and hypothesis.

Medical hypotheses·2000
Same author

The Woolley and Roe case.

British journal of anaesthesia·2000
Same author

Sumatriptan and postdural puncture headache.

Anaesthesia·1997
Same author

Maternal sequelae of childbirth.

British journal of anaesthesia·1996
Same author

Multiple sclerosis: sunlight, diet, immunology and aetiology.

Medical hypotheses·1996

Area of Science:

  • Medicine
  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical History

Background:

  • The 1953 Roe v. Woolley case involved patients developing spastic paraparesis after spinal anesthesia.
  • The court initially attributed the paralysis to phenol contamination from sterilizing anesthetic ampoules via invisible glass cracks.

Observation:

  • Phenol, used for sterilizing ampoule exteriors, is implicated as the contaminant.
  • The study re-examines the historical case with new information to identify the probable source of paralysis.

Findings:

  • The most likely cause of paralysis in three patients was phenol contamination of spinal anesthetic solutions.
  • Phenol likely entered the anesthetic via microscopic, undetectable cracks in the glass ampoules.

Implications:

  • This re-evaluation offers a plausible explanation for the 1953 paralysis cases and potentially other similar incidents.
  • Understanding historical contamination routes can inform modern anesthetic safety protocols and prevent future adverse events.

Related Experiment Videos