Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data00:59

How Data are Classified: Numerical Data

Data that are countable or measurable in specific units are called numerical or quantitative data. Quantitative data are always numbers. Quantitative data are the result of counting or measuring the attributes of a population. Amount of money, pulse rate, weight, number of people living in a town, and number of students who opt for statistics are examples of quantitative data.
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Context-dependent indirect effects mediate ecological transitions between parasitism and mutualism.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Microbial, genetic, and urban drivers of ant invasions.

Current opinion in insect science·2025
Same author

Fire ants exhibit self-medication but lack preventive behavioral immunity against a viral pathogen.

Journal of invertebrate pathology·2025
Same author

What you eat is what we need: using ants to detect spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) DNA.

Pest management science·2025
Same author

Carcass size, not source or taxon, dictates breeding performance and carcass use in a burying beetle.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Echocardiography and Management for Cardiac Trauma.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Class-imbalanced classifiers for high-dimensional data.

Wei-Jiun Lin1, James J Chen

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics, Feng Chia University, Taiwan.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|March 13, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Class-imbalanced classifiers improve minority class prediction accuracy. Support vector machines (SVM) with ensemble correction excel in moderate imbalance, while SVM threshold adjustment (SVM-THR) is effective for severe imbalance and correlated data.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Bioinformatics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Class-imbalanced data presents challenges for standard classification algorithms, often leading to poor minority class prediction.
  • Addressing differential class sizes is crucial for accurate predictive modeling in various scientific domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate key methods for class prediction in high-dimensional, imbalanced datasets.
  • To analyze the performance of different class-imbalanced classifiers considering factors like imbalance ratio and feature selection.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of four class-imbalanced classifiers: diagonal linear discriminant analysis (DLDA), random forests (RFs), support vector machines (SVMs) with ensemble correction, and SVM threshold adjustment (SVM-THR).
  • Utilized Monte-Carlo simulations and five genomic datasets for empirical analysis.
  • Investigated fundamental issues including imbalance ratio, small disjuncts, overlap complexity, data scarcity, and feature selection.

Main Results:

  • The SVM-ensemble classifier demonstrated superior performance when class imbalance was not severe.
  • SVM-THR proved effective in cases of severe imbalance and highly correlated predictors.
  • DLDA, particularly with feature selection, showed good performance without requiring ensemble correction.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of class-imbalanced classifier depends on the specific characteristics of the data, such as the degree of imbalance and predictor correlation.
  • Feature selection can enhance the performance of certain classifiers like DLDA, offering a viable alternative to ensemble methods.