Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Associative Learning

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...

Teeth

Teeth

The formation of teeth, also known as odontogenesis, is a complex process that begins in utero, around the sixth week of embryonic development. There are three stages to this process: the bud stage, the cap stage, and the bell stage.
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin and...

Complexometric Titration: Ligands

Complexometric Titration: Ligands

Different monodentate and polydentate ligands are used as complexing agents in complexometric titration reactions. The formation of complexes by mono- and bidentate ligands involves two or more intermediate steps, limiting their use as complexing agents. In comparison, polydentate ligands can form complexes with metal ions in a single-step process, facilitating sharper end points. This means polydentate ligands, such as amino carboxylic acid derivatives, are most commonly employed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Factors important to historically underrepresented applicants in ranking orthodontic programs.

The Angle orthodontist·2026

Same author

Gender Equity in Endodontic Scholarship and Academia.

Journal of endodontics·2025

Same author

Clinical performance of at-home dental bleaching in younger and older adults: A non-randomized, double-blind trial.

Journal of dentistry·2025

Same author

Can Caregivers Reliably Assess Their Child's Heart Rate and Respiration Rate Using Smartphone or Smartwatch Applications?

Pediatric emergency care·2025

Same author

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Layers Enriched with Silver Nanoparticles on Orthodontic Microimplants.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2025

Same author

How AI-Driven Root and Bone Predictions Can Assist Clear Aligner Treatment Planning.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Published on: February 23, 2024

Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Chase Prettyman¹, Al M Best, Steven J Lindauer

¹Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

The Angle Orthodontist

|March 14, 2012

Summary

Orthodontists prefer self-ligating brackets (SLB) for initial treatment progress but favor conventional brackets (CB) for finishing due to cost and fewer emergencies. Preference depends on experience and appointment intervals.

More Related Videos

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Published on: July 24, 2018

Robust Ligature-Induced Model of Murine Periodontitis for the Evaluation of Oral Neutrophils

Robust Ligature-Induced Model of Murine Periodontitis for the Evaluation of Oral Neutrophils

Published on: January 21, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Published on: February 23, 2024

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Published on: July 24, 2018

Robust Ligature-Induced Model of Murine Periodontitis for the Evaluation of Oral Neutrophils

Robust Ligature-Induced Model of Murine Periodontitis for the Evaluation of Oral Neutrophils

Published on: January 21, 2020

Area of Science:

Orthodontics
Dental Materials Science

Background:

Self-ligating brackets (SLB) and conventional brackets (CB) are widely used in orthodontic treatment.
Understanding orthodontists' perceptions of their clinical differences is crucial for treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare orthodontists' perceptions of clinical differences between SLB and CB during orthodontic treatment.
To identify factors influencing orthodontists' bracket preferences.

Main Methods:

A survey was developed and distributed to orthodontists (n=430).
The survey assessed perceptions regarding the comparison of SLB versus CB.

Main Results:

SLB were preferred for initial treatment stages due to shorter adjustment appointments and faster progress (P < .0001).
CB were preferred for finishing and detailing stages (P < .0001).
CB were favored for lower cost and fewer emergency appointments.

Conclusions:

Orthodontist preference for SLB or CB is significantly influenced by the proportion of patients treated with SLB (P < .0001).
The learning curve associated with SLB (number of cases to adapt) impacts preference (P < .0001).
Average appointment intervals for SLB also significantly affect orthodontists' choices (P < .0001).