Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

In Vitro 3D Cell-Cultured Arterial Models for Studying Vascular Drug Targeting Under Flow
Published on: March 14, 2021
Vascular disrupting agents: a delicate balance between efficacy and side effects
Antoine Hollebecque1, Christophe Massard, Jean-Charles Soria
1Service d'Innovations Thérapeutiques Précoces, Département de Médecine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) show promise in cancer therapy by targeting tumor blood vessels. However, their clinical development is hindered by toxicities and a lack of predictive biomarkers, limiting their efficacy in trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Vascular Biology
- Drug Development
Background:
- Targeting tumor vasculature is a key strategy in cancer therapy.
- Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) induce tumor necrosis by targeting abnormal tumor blood vessels.
- VDAs represent a unique class of anticancer compounds with potential therapeutic applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical development of VDAs, focusing on their safety and efficacy.
- To summarize the current status of VDAs in cancer treatment.
- To highlight challenges and future directions for VDA clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of clinical trial data for VDAs.
- Analysis of safety profiles, including cardiovascular, neurological, and hematological toxicities.
- Evaluation of efficacy data across various tumor types, including anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) and nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).
Main Results:
- VDAs have shown clinical activity in diverse tumor types such as ATC, NSCLC, ovarian cancer, and sarcoma.
- Clinical development has been challenged by significant toxicities, particularly cardiovascular and neurological when used as single agents, and hematological toxicity in combination regimens.
- Several negative Phase II/III trials in NSCLC, ATC, and castration-refractory metastatic prostate cancer underscore the high risk of failure.
- Lack of predictive biomarkers to identify responsive patients is a major limitation.
Conclusions:
- VDAs are a distinct class of anticancer agents with demonstrated activity but face significant hurdles in clinical development.
- Toxicity profiles require careful management, especially when combined with chemotherapy.
- The identification and validation of molecular predictors of efficacy are critical for the successful advancement of VDAs.
- While objective responses have been observed, VDAs have not consistently demonstrated a survival advantage in major clinical trials, particularly in combination therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Cytotoxic Edema: Pathophysiology
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

