Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Modified adenotonsillectomy to improve cure rates for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled
Michael Friedman1, Christian G Samuelson, Craig Hamilton
1Advanced Center for Specialty Care, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60602, USA. hednnek@aol.com
Insights
Adding pharyngoplasty to adenotonsillectomy for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) did not significantly improve cure rates. High patient dropout made the study inconclusive for OSAHS treatment efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Sleep Medicine
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) significantly impacts children's health and quality of life.
- Adenotonsillectomy (T&A) is a primary treatment, but cure rates can vary.
- Pharyngoplasty, a modification of T&A, aims to improve outcomes by addressing palatal tissues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of standard T&A versus T&A with pharyngoplasty in treating pediatric OSAHS.
- To evaluate surgical cure rates, quality of life, and functional recovery.
Main Methods:
- Randomized single-blind controlled study at a tertiary care center.
- Sixty pediatric patients with OSAHS were randomized to T&A or T&A with pharyngoplasty.
- Surgical cure defined by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and OSA-18 quality-of-life scores.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in cure rates between standard T&A (60%) and T&A with pharyngoplasty (56.6%) in intention-to-treat analysis.
- A trend towards higher cure rates (72% vs 89.5%) and greater OSA-18 improvement was observed in the pharyngoplasty group among patients with complete data.
- Pharyngoplasty showed nonsignificant improvements in AHI and faster return to normal diet and activity.
Conclusions:
- Addition of pharyngoplasty to T&A did not significantly improve OSAHS cure rates based on sleep testing and quality of life measures.
- A high rate of patient dropout limited statistical power, rendering the study inconclusive.
- Further research is needed to determine the role of pharyngoplasty in pediatric OSAHS management.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy of adenotonsillectomy (T&A) with and without pharyngoplasty (tonsillar pillar closure) in the treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).
Study Design:
Randomized single-blind controlled study.
Setting:
Tertiary care center.
Subjects And Methods:
Sixty pediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of OSAHS presenting between January 2009 and December 2010 were enrolled and randomized to undergo either standard T&A (n = 30) or T&A with pharyngoplasty (n = 30). Surgical cure was defined as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) <5 plus OSA-18 health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) score <60. Other outcomes included postsurgical AHI and minimum oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) improvement, changes in OSA-18 scores at 1 month, and postsurgical days to resume normal diet and activity.
Results:
Three patients from each group did not undergo surgery. Of the 54 patients treated, 8 from the pharyngoplasty group and 2 from the standard group were lost to follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no difference in cure rate between groups (standard 60%, pharyngoplasty 56.6%, P = .793). Limiting analysis to those patients with complete data, a higher, but not significantly increased, cure rate with pharyngoplasty was noted (72% vs 89.5%, P = .155). Greater OSA-18 improvement (P = .036) and greater (although nonsignificant) AHI improvement and earlier return to normal function were noted with pharyngoplasty.
Conclusion:
The addition of pharyngoplasty to traditional adenotonsillectomy did not significantly improve OSAHS cure rates as measured by sleep testing and HRQL, although a nonsignificant increase in cure rate was observed in those who completed the study protocol. An unexpectedly high rate of patient dropout rendered the study statistically underpowered and therefore inconclusive.
Related Concept Videos
Tonsillitis I: Introduction
Etiology
Three primary contributing factors have been identified.
Chronic Pharyngitis
Etiology
It often arises from persistent viral or bacterial infections affecting sinuses and tonsils.
Additional contributing factors include inadequate dental hygiene, mouth breathing, recurring tonsillitis, allergic rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and exposure to smoke, chemicals, and other environmental pollutants. Allergic reactions to pollen, mold, and pet dander, chronic cough, excessive voice usage,...
Tonsillitis II: Management
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...

