Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026
The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
[Comparison of ultrasound-guided and blindly placed radial artery catheterization]
Mitsutaka Edanaga1, Mitsuko Mimura, Takashi Azumaguchi
1Department of Anesthesia, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone East Corporation Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo 060-8541.
Insights
Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization appears safe and educational, though this study found no significant decrease in failed attempts compared to traditional methods. Further research may clarify its benefits.
Area of Science:
- Medical Procedures
- Vascular Access
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Arterial catheterization is crucial for hemodynamic monitoring.
- Failed attempts can lead to complications and patient discomfort.
- Ultrasound (US) guidance is increasingly used in vascular access procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization reduces failed attempts.
- To compare the efficacy of US-guided techniques versus blind palpation.
Main Methods:
- 36 patients requiring arterial catheters were divided into three groups: blind palpation, US-guided short-axis, and US-guided long-axis.
- A single anesthesiologist performed all vascular access procedures.
- The number of catheter placement attempts was recorded and compared across groups.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in the number of attempts was observed between the groups (P = 0.268).
- A trend towards smaller deviation in attempts was noted in the US-guided groups.
- Ultrasound visualization of the artery and catheter was confirmed.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization is a safe technique.
- The visualization provided by ultrasound makes it an educational tool for practitioners.
- While not definitively reducing failed attempts in this study, US guidance offers potential benefits.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound (US)-guided radial artery catheterization decreases the number of failed attempts.
Methods:
A total of 36 patients requiring an arterial catheter were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) a blind palpation technique group, 2) an US-guided short-axis group, and 3) an US-guided long-axis group. The vascular access was performed by one anesthesiologist. The number of attempts at catheter placement was compared within the groups.
Results:
There were no significant differences among the groups in number of attemps (P = 0.268); however, it seems that the deviation of attempts was small in the US groups.
Conclusions:
Because the artery and catheter are actually visualized by US, it seems, that US-guided radial artery catheterization is a safe and educational technique.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
01:24Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
01:28Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
01:25Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
01:21Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment: