Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practice guidelines and outcomes. Where are we headed?

D B Nash1

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Clinical Outcomes, Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa. 19107-5099.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Developing clinical guidelines requires linking standards to patient outcomes. Expert consensus clashes with physician judgment, and poor evidence quality presents challenges to widespread adoption for better healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ACGME competencies in neurology: web-based objective simulated computerized clinical encounters.

Neurology·2009
Same author

Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of sumatriptan in patients with migraine.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2001
Same author

Pharmacoeconomic fellowships: the need for outcome measures.

PharmacoEconomics·2001
Same author

Certificate of need and the quality of cardiac surgery.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2001
Same author

Physician executives report high job satisfaction. Summary of findings from a survey of senior physician executives.

Physician executive·2001
Same author

'Feeling the burn': making strides toward today's healthcare consumer.

Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality·2001

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Informatics
  • Medical Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Healthcare systems are driven by forces necessitating clinical standards and guidelines.
  • Effective guideline development requires a feedback loop for accurate patient outcome assessment.
  • Current processes face challenges due to conflicting expert opinions and physician judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the forces driving clinical guideline development.
  • To address the controversy between expert consensus and individual physician estimations of patient outcomes.
  • To identify challenges hindering widespread guideline adoption by clinicians.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the current landscape of clinical guideline development.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the "feedback-loop" system for patient outcome assessment.
  • Review of controversies and challenges in guideline implementation.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant forces drive guideline development, but a "feedback-loop" to patient outcomes is crucial.
    • A core controversy exists between expert consensus panels and individual physician outcome estimations.
    • Poor quality of medical evidence and at least four major challenges impede widespread clinician adoption of guidelines.
    • A new federal agency may offer resources to advance the discussion on guidelines.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical guidelines hold the potential to enhance the quality of medical care.
    • Addressing the identified challenges is essential for successful guideline implementation.
    • Further research and resources are needed to refine the process of developing and adopting clinical guidelines.